cardsfan07 25 Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 Does anyone know what happened to Wet Brianna? Her C4S store is down and videos I purchased are even removed. durianfury, BryanOMO and ero9007 3 Link to comment
Chris_P_Bacon 385 Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 34 minutes ago, cardsfan07 said: Does anyone know what happened to Wet Brianna? Her C4S store is down and videos I purchased are even removed. best guess would be that she has closed down her store pages and has decided to stop making videos Link to comment
amasonbo1 515 Posted February 17, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 17, 2022 Both Clips4Sale and ManyVids instituted a policy that any person appearing in videos, even in the background, needs to have some kind of consent form, or ID verification on file. Effectively, this kills the market for videos filmed in public, which was what 95% of her catalog was. Last I knew she was trying to figure out a way around this, but it seems she decided to just quit. I do remember her mentioning this on her Twitter, which is now gone too, to which I replied saying that maybe she could move into doing videos that weren't set in public, or that somehow didn't show other people. She seemed to not like the idea of that. Her videos were hot, but I did always feel weird about the fact that she's forcing others to watch her sexual acts without their consent, and also that she's leaving a mess for a bunch of poor retail workers that now have to clean up a grown women's urine because they like wetting on purpose in public. yertle2012, LochBlk52, omodaddy and 10 others 12 1 Link to comment
strokeknight2 582 Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 37 minutes ago, amasonbo1 said: Her videos were hot, but I did always feel weird about the fact that she's forcing others to watch her sexual acts without their consent, and also that she's leaving a mess for a bunch of poor retail workers that now have to clean up a grown women's urine because they like wetting on purpose in public. Same. I'm surprised she got as popular as she did considering every video was breaking the #1 rule of this community and violating consent. ero9007, Kyuu, Hedonist and 3 others 6 Link to comment
MasterP 710 Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 I heard her complain of video piracy and was tired of fighting it. I thought she had an account here? Even if she isn't filming anymore, i figured she'd still communicate with us like-minded heathens 😛 I don't see why she wouldn't use the market place here? I know that C4s is has a huge reach, but at least it is something. Hard to say since I don't know her motivation. Her content will be missed! durianfury 1 Link to comment
Jonnaywets 204 Posted February 18, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 18, 2022 I’m sorry I know this is controversial but I am shameless her vids are HOT and it I want to see more just like that. I know that sometimes there can be collateral damage but it is perfectly plausible that an adult can have an accident in public! a1234, Will88, Kyuu and 8 others 8 2 1 Link to comment
SecretWetter97 120 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 4 hours ago, strokeknight2 said: Same. I'm surprised she got as popular as she did considering every video was breaking the #1 rule of this community and violating consent. It might’ve been breaking the “Golden rule” but I know I guiltily watched so many of her videos and ones like it amasonbo1 1 Link to comment
omodaddy 477 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 6 hours ago, amasonbo1 said: Her videos were hot, but I did always feel weird about the fact that she's forcing others to watch her sexual acts without their consent, and also that she's leaving a mess for a bunch of poor retail workers that now have to clean up a grown women's urine because they like wetting on purpose in public. Exactly, end of the day she totally left huge piss puddles behind in several establishments for staff forced to clean up. We all know she totally did not go back and clean it. That part was not cool. Personally I don’t care how hot the vid is, leaving piss puddles inside of public establishments isn’t the way. This is a niche fetish - at the same time, have some dignity & consideration. She got mad and because she would rather piss her pants in line at Dairy Queen, leave a huge urine puddle for staff to clean instead of pissing her pants at home in private and make sell clips that way. Unbelievable. roeroerowrow, amasonbo1, MadeOfWax and 3 others 6 Link to comment
ero9007 872 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 1 hour ago, aklong said: Exactly, end of the day she totally left huge piss puddles behind in several establishments for staff forced to clean up. We all know she totally did not go back and clean it. That part was not cool. Personally I don’t care how hot the vid is, leaving piss puddles inside of public establishments isn’t the way. This is a niche fetish - at the same time, have some dignity & consideration. She got mad and because she would rather piss her pants in line at Dairy Queen, leave a huge urine puddle for staff to clean instead of pissing her pants at home in private and make sell clips that way. Unbelievable. There were some videos of her wearing long boots, don't leave a huge urine puddle, most of the piss get inside her boot. nwohdeh 1 Link to comment
omodaddy 477 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 10 hours ago, ero9007 said: There were some videos of her wearing long boots, don't leave a huge urine puddle, most of the piss get inside her boot. 10 hours ago, ero9007 said: There were some videos of her wearing long boots, don't leave a huge urine puddle, most of the piss get inside her boot. I will allow evidence to speak for itself durianfury, roeroerowrow and ero9007 3 Link to comment
peedipe 79 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 She was the hottest wetter I've seen. I agree that it's not nice for someone to have to pay for the clean-up, but for videos that hot, I don't really care. There's a trillion things going on in the world every split second, and there's a lot worse things going on in the world than a carpet tile in some bookshop back in 2020 getting some pee on it. If it was dangerous, that would be another story, like someone on crutches slipping on it. But I try not to think about hypothetical stuff like that when I'm watching these things. If anything, the naughtiness makes it hotter, and you don't get that level of peril in a bathtub wetting or a back garden wetting. I just wish I got more of her videos before they bit the dust, like all good things do these days. Jonnaywets, RainbowPrideK9, Kyuu and 5 others 5 2 1 Link to comment
omodaddy 477 Posted February 18, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 18, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, peedipe said: She was the hottest wetter I've seen. I agree that it's not nice for someone to have to pay for the clean-up, but for videos that hot, I don't really care. There's a trillion things going on in the world every split second, and there's a lot worse things going on in the world than a carpet tile in some bookshop back in 2020 getting some pee on it. If it was dangerous, that would be another story, like someone on crutches slipping on it. But I try not to think about hypothetical stuff like that when I'm watching these things. If anything, the naughtiness makes it hotter, and you don't get that level of peril in a bathtub wetting or a back garden wetting. I just wish I got more of her videos before they bit the dust, like all good things do these days. No you don’t get the same thrill, but you gotta see it from the other side. I mean, would you really want to clean up someone’s piss? From them “purposely” leaving a puddle? No one cares until it’s them. Just saying this fetish should come with some consideration above pleasure. But if anyone doesn’t see it that way, then have at it. I’ve have had conversations with omo content makers on twitter and when this topic came up they felt & believed it was one of the most trifling & inhumane ways to make a video, by leaving piss puddles behind. I’ve supported her store since she’s been around and when I kept noticing she left urine puddles everywhere, that’s totally not cool and signs of no character. This is not a fetish for everyone and many people of the world considers urine as disgusting because it’s bodily waste. Hey, each their own tho! Edited February 18, 2022 by aklong (see edit history) knockonthedoor, amasonbo1, roeroerowrow and 4 others 7 Link to comment
peedipe 79 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 18 minutes ago, aklong said: No you don’t get the same thrill, but you gotta see it from the other side. I mean, would you really want to clean up someone’s piss? From them “purposely” leaving a puddle? No one cares until it’s them. Just saying this fetish should come with some consideration above pleasure. But if anyone doesn’t see it that way, then have at it. I’ve have had conversations with omo content makers on twitter and when this topic came up they felt & believed it was one of the most trifling & inhumane ways to make a video, by leaving piss puddles behind. I’ve supported her store since she’s been around and when I kept noticing she left urine puddles everywhere, that’s totally not cool and signs of no character. This is not a fetish for everyone and many people of the world considers urine as disgusting because it’s bodily waste. Hey, each their own tho! I understand where you're coming from. It's definitely not a cool thing to do. But for me, I can let it go. I just can't get all that concerned about a random person on the other side of the world, two or three years ago, having to wipe up some pee on the floor at work. They probably don't even remember it after all this time, or didn't know it was pee anyway, as pee doesn't actually smell that much. I used to get outraged on other people's behalf more, but then I learnt that some things just have to be let go. Now that we're all online, everything is amplified. Things that were once forgotten and moved on from, become trends, and campaigns, and political stances, and movements, and then a community gets divided into the ones that think something's okay and the ones that think something's not okay, and then there's drama and it's affecting people's mental health, and in the meantime, the person who had to wipe up a bit of pee at work a couple of years ago is now a team leader, has just bought their first house, and still doesn't know you exist. If you set up a JustGiving page, they wouldn't even click on the link. That's the sort of person they are. Probably. Jonnaywets 1 Link to comment
TVGuy 10,658 Posted February 18, 2022 🌟 OmoOrg VIP Popular Post Share Posted February 18, 2022 (edited) On 2/17/2022 at 12:44 PM, MasterP said: I heard her complain of video piracy and was tired of fighting it. I thought she had an account here? Even if she isn't filming anymore, i figured she'd still communicate with us like-minded heathens 😛 I don't see why she wouldn't use the market place here? I know that C4s is has a huge reach, but at least it is something. Hard to say since I don't know her motivation. Piracy definitely is harmful to content creators, especially independent creators who rely on sites like Clips4Sale. Imagine putting all that time and effort into making a video, only to sell 4 downloads, but have it pirated hundreds, or even thousands of times. It is incredibly discouraging. Modern video piracy online is no longer just customers sharing their favorite videos on various forums. It has become an integral tool in international money laundering for giant crime syndicates. Basically, it is how you can convert stolen credit card data, in bulk, to untraceable cash. Going after large content creators would draw attention and a possible law enforcement response, but small time individuals posting on C4S and Only Fans? Well, they make ideal targets for these kind of schemes. 22 hours ago, Jonnaywets said: I’m sorry I know this is controversial but I am shameless her vids are HOT and it I want to see more just like that. I know that sometimes there can be collateral damage but it is perfectly plausible that an adult can have an accident in public! 6 hours ago, peedipe said: I agree that it's not nice for someone to have to pay for the clean-up, but for videos that hot, I don't really care. There's a trillion things going on in the world every split second, and there's a lot worse things going on in the world than a carpet tile in some bookshop back in 2020 getting some pee on it. If it was dangerous, that would be another story, like someone on crutches slipping on it. But I try not to think about hypothetical stuff like that when I'm watching these things. If anything, the naughtiness makes it hotter, and you don't get that level of peril in a bathtub wetting or a back garden wetting. I just wish I got more of her videos before they bit the dust, like all good things do these days. Morality set aside, there are a number of legal issues she could be facing. If someone else has to clean up after her, that could be considered vandalism. Not taking care of bodily waste of any kind and leaving it behind could fall under the category of offensive littering. If anything she does causes another person to unwillingly come into contact with her urine, you have assault, and if someone is legitimately disturbed, disgusted, or offended by her actions, you have a case for harassment. Now, I know some of you will likely argue that I am being ridiculous here. That there is no difference between what she is doing and someone having a legitimate accident, and surely you can't charge someone who has a legitimate accident with such crimes. But, under the law there is a difference because what she is doing is intentional. For a crime to have been committed, there are two requirements- 1)Actus reus which is the physical criminal act itself. This condition would be met by someone who has a legimate accident, as well as someone doing it intentionally for a video. But the second condition 2)Mens rea is the intentional motivation behind the act, and the understanding on the culprits part that they were intentionally doing something that could have these outcomes. And it's not like people haven't been criminally charged for such things before. A video creator who went by the handle Leaky Lacie, who was most famously charged after her and her husband filmed themselves having sex on a ferris wheel, also faced numerous charges from videos where she urinated in a public elevator and on two vending machines. In another, much older case, a woman was arrested after creating a video where she peed on new furniture in a store. In that case, charges also included grand theft, due to the property damage. While not in the US, there was also a case in Australia I read about where a 20 year old woman and her boyfriend were arrested after he filmed her peeing in her pants in a supermarket. In all these cases, the videos that the suspects themselves produced were used as evidence against them. Considering the nature off Wet Brianna's videos, I am not terribly surprised she would want to take them down. I think if she were to have continued it would only have been a matter of time before she faced legal repercussions. Even if she stopped making new videos, she could still face charges for leaving her old videos up. On 2/17/2022 at 11:19 AM, amasonbo1 said: Both Clips4Sale and ManyVids instituted a policy that any person appearing in videos, even in the background, needs to have some kind of consent form, or ID verification on file. Effectively, this kills the market for videos filmed in public, which was what 95% of her catalog was. Last I knew she was trying to figure out a way around this, but it seems she decided to just quit. This isn't a Clips4Sale or ManyVids policy. It is the law- USC Title 18.2257. Specific proof of age records are required for any person appearing in any kind of an adult video- Quote (a) Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which— (1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and (2) is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction. (b) Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall, with respect to every performer portrayed in a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct— (1) ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing such information, the performer’s name and date of birth, and require the performer to provide such other indicia of his or her identity as may be prescribed by regulations; (2) ascertain any name, other than the performer’s present and correct name, ever used by the performer including maiden name, alias, nickname, stage, or professional name; and (3) record in the records required by subsection (a) the information required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection and such other identifying information as may be prescribed by regulation. (c) Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall maintain the records required by this section at his business premises, or at such other place as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe and shall make such records available to the Attorney General for inspection at all reasonable times. (d) (1) No information or evidence obtained from records required to be created or maintained by this section shall, except as provided in this section, directly or indirectly, be used as evidence against any person with respect to any violation of law. (2) Paragraph (1) of this subsection shall not preclude the use of such information or evidence in a prosecution or other action for a violation of this chapter or chapter 71, or for a violation of any applicable provision of law with respect to the furnishing of false information. (e) (1) Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall cause to be affixed to every copy of any matter described in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this section, in such manner and in such form as the Attorney General shall by regulations prescribe, a statement describing where the records required by this section with respect to all performers depicted in that copy of the matter may be located. In this paragraph, the term “copy” includes every page of a website on which matter described in subsection (a) appears. (2) If the person to whom subsection (a) of this section applies is an organization the statement required by this subsection shall include the name, title, and business address of the individual employed by such organization responsible for maintaining the records required by this section. (f) It shall be unlawful— (1) for any person to whom subsection (a) applies to fail to create or maintain the records as required by subsections (a) and (c) or by any regulation promulgated under this section; (2) for any person to whom subsection (a) applies knowingly to make any false entry in or knowingly to fail to make an appropriate entry in, any record required by subsection (b) of this section or any regulation promulgated under this section; (3) for any person to whom subsection (a) applies knowingly to fail to comply with the provisions of subsection (e) or any regulation promulgated pursuant to that subsection; (4) for any person knowingly to sell or otherwise transfer, or offer for sale or transfer, any book, magazine, periodical, film, video, or other matter, produce in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce or which is intended for shipment in interstate or foreign commerce, which— (A) contains one or more visual depictions made after the effective date of this subsection of actual sexually explicit conduct; and (B) is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce; which does not have affixed thereto, in a manner prescribed as set forth in subsection (e)(1), a statement describing where the records required by this section may be located, but such person shall have no duty to determine the accuracy of the contents of the statement or the records required to be kept; and (5) for any person to whom subsection (a) applies to refuse to permit the Attorney General or his or her designee to conduct an inspection under subsection (c). (g) The Attorney General shall issue appropriate regulations to carry out this section. (h) In this section— (1) the term “actual sexually explicit conduct” means actual but not simulated conduct as defined in clauses (i) through (v) of section 2256(2)(A) of this title; (2) the term “produces”— (A) means— (i) actually filming, videotaping, photographing, creating a picture, digital image, or digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being; (ii) digitizing an image, of a visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct; or, assembling, manufacturing, publishing, duplicating, reproducing, or reissuing a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, or picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution, that contains a visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct; or (iii) inserting on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise managing the sexually explicit content,[1] of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of, sexually explicit conduct; and (B) does not include activities that are limited to— (i) photo or film processing, including digitization of previously existing visual depictions, as part of a commercial enterprise, with no other commercial interest in the sexually explicit material, printing, and video duplication; (ii) distribution; (iii) any activity, other than those activities identified in subparagraph (A), that does not involve the hiring, contracting for, managing, or otherwise arranging for the participation of the depicted performers; (iv) the provision of a telecommunications service, or of an Internet access service or Internet information location tool (as those terms are defined in section 231 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 231)); or (v) the transmission, storage, retrieval, hosting, formatting, or translation (or any combination thereof) of a communication, without selection or alteration of the content of the communication, except that deletion of a particular communication or material made by another person in a manner consistent with section 230(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(c)) shall not constitute such selection or alteration of the content of the communication; and (3) the term “performer” includes any person portrayed in a visual depiction engaging in, or assisting another person to engage in, sexually explicit conduct. (i) Whoever violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, and fined in accordance with the provisions of this title, or both. Whoever violates this section after having been convicted of a violation punishable under this section shall be imprisoned for any period of years not more than 10 years but not less than 2 years, and fined in accordance with the provisions of this title, or both. Now, upon reading this law, you may be inclined to argue that Brianna's videos do not contain "actual sexually explicit conduct," but if we look at the law's definition of what that means it says- Quote (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), “sexually explicit conduct” means actual or simulated— (i)sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; (ii)bestiality; (iii)masturbation; (iv)sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (v)lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person; (B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) [1] of this section, “sexually explicit conduct” means— (i)graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited; (ii) graphic or lascivious simulated; (I)bestiality; (II)masturbation; or (III)sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (iii)graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person; How this applies to these videos is in the court's interpretation of what includes lascivious exhibition of the pubic area. Quote Lascivious exhibition would include any visual depiction of the pubic region, clothed or unclothed, where the primary intent is titillate, arouse, or otherwise primarily appeal the the prurient interest. This includes depictions of ejaculation, menstruation, urination, or defecation for these purposes. Until recently, Clips4sale allowed content creators to check a box certifying that they were in compliance with USC 18.2257, but required no additional verification. However, this recently changed. After the fallout of the "GirlsDoPorn" atrocity, where the victims were continually harmed by the presence of their videos on sites like PornHub. As a result of this, the US Government has expanded its regulations regarding record keeping. Originally only requiring primary producers to keep and maintain proof of age records, the law now requires secondary producers, who host porn online, to also maintain a copy of these same records. The law and Clips4sale have always required Brianna to keep these records. Only now, her, and other producers, have to demonstrate that they are actually doing it in order to continue. Edited February 18, 2022 by TVGuy Fixed typo (see edit history) icyfresh99, yertle2012, Despguy123 and 16 others 14 5 Link to comment
pissypants2005 112 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 3 hours ago, TVGuy said: Piracy definitely is harmful to content creators, especially independent creators who rely on sites like Clips4Sale. Imagine putting all that time and effort into making a video, only to sell 4 downloads, but have it pirated hundreds, or even thousands of times. It is incredibly discouraging. Modern video piracy online is no longer just customers sharing their favorite videos on various forums. It has become an integral tool in international money laundering for giant crime syndicates. Basically, it is how you can convert stolen credit card data, in bulk, to untraceable cash. Going after large content creators would draw attention and a possible law enforcement response, but small time individuals posting on C4S and Only Fans? Well, they make ideal targets for these kind of schemes. Morality set aside, there are a number of legal issues she could be facing. If someone else has to clean up after her, that could be considered vandalism. Not taking care of bodily waste of any kind and leaving it behind could fall under the category of offensive littering. If anything she does causes another person to unwillingly come into contact with her urine, you have assault, and if someone is legitimately disturbed, disgusted, or offended by her actions, you have a case for harassment. Now, I know some of you will likely argue that I am being ridiculous here. That there is no difference between what she is doing and someone having a legitimate accident, and surely you can't charge someone who has a legitimate accident with such crimes. But, under the law there is a difference because what she is doing is intentional. For a crime to have been committed, there are two requirements- 1)Actus reus which is the physical criminal act itself. This condition would be met by someone who has a legimate accident, as well as someone doing it intentionally for a video. But the second condition 2)Mens rea is the intentional motivation behind the act, and the understanding on the culprits part that they were intentionally doing something that could have these outcomes. And it's not like people haven't been criminally charged for such things before. A video creator who went by the handle Leaky Lacie, who was most famously charged after her and her husband filmed themselves having sex on a ferris wheel, also faced numerous charges from videos where she urinated in a public elevator and on two vending machines. In another, much older case, a woman was arrested after creating a video where she peed on new furniture in a store. In that case, charges also included grand theft, due to the property damage. While not in the US, there was also a case in Australia I read about where a 20 year old woman and her boyfriend were arrested after he filmed her peeing in her pants in a supermarket. In all these cases, the videos that the suspects themselves produced were used as evidence against them. Considering the nature off Wet Brianna's videos, I am not terribly surprised she would want to take them down. I think if she were to have continued it would only have been a matter of time before she faced legal repercussions. Even if she stopped making new videos, she could still face charges for leaving her old videos up. This isn't a Clips4Sale or ManyVids policy. It is the law- USC Title 18.2257. Specific proof of age records are required for any person appearing in any kind of an adult video- Now, upon reading this law, you may be inclined to argue that Brianna's videos do not contain "actual sexually explicit conduct," but if we look at the law's definition of what that means it says- Where this applies to these videos is in the court's interpretation of what includes lascivious exhibition of the public area. Until recently, Clips4sale allowed content creators to check a box certifying that they were in compliance with USC 18.2257, but required no additional verification. However, this recently changed. After the fallout of the "GirlsDoPorn" atrocity, where the victims were continually harmed by the presence of their videos on sites like PornHub. As a result of this, the US Government has expanded its regulations regarding record keeping. Originally only requiring primary producers to keep and maintain proof of age records, the law now requires secondary producers, who host porn online, to also maintain a copy of these same records. The law and Clips4sale have always required Brianna to keep these records. Only now, her, and other producers, have to demonstrate that they are actually doing it in order to continue. When TVGuy isn’t making amazing content he spends his spare time being an attorney. There was a lot of thought put into that response. Thanks! frosty, durianfury, wilbob76 and 2 others 5 Link to comment
Redd 268 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 I don't know how I missed out on her. Very attractive and very daring. I'd volunteer to be her cleanup crew. Link to comment
amasonbo1 515 Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 4 hours ago, TVGuy said: This isn't a Clips4Sale or ManyVids policy. It is the law- USC Title 18.2257. Specific proof of age records are required for any person appearing in any kind of an adult video- Thanks for correcting me, I knew about that specific law but I didn't know exactly how it applied. I hadn't realized that these stores weren't actually doing anything new per se, but instead tightening up what was already on the books. Link to comment
Guest BigeBigeboye100 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 11 hours ago, aklong said: I will allow evidence to speak for itself These aren't long boots, they're ankle boots. He was referring to boots that are knee length-ish. Link to comment
PoutyPoet 83 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 (edited) Quote On 2/17/2022 at 2:19 PM, amasonbo1 said: Both Clips4Sale and ManyVids instituted a policy that any person appearing in videos, even in the background, needs to have some kind of consent form, or ID verification on file. Effectively, this kills the market for videos filmed in public, which was what 95% of her catalog was. Last I knew she was trying to figure out a way around this, but it seems she decided to just quit. I do remember her mentioning this on her Twitter, which is now gone too, to which I replied saying that maybe she could move into doing videos that weren't set in public, or that somehow didn't show other people. She seemed to not like the idea of that. Her videos were hot, but I did always feel weird about the fact that she's forcing others to watch her sexual acts without their consent, and also that she's leaving a mess for a bunch of poor retail workers that now have to clean up a grown women's urine because they like wetting on purpose in public. Why wouldn't she just blur others' faces as they do for JAVs filmed under Asian countries' oppressive privacy laws? Edited February 19, 2022 by PoutyPoet (see edit history) Link to comment
omodaddy 477 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 5 hours ago, BigeBigeboye100 said: These aren't long boots, they're ankle boots. He was referring to boots that are knee length-ish. I believe you either misread or didn’t read my comment, I’m backing my statement with clear evidence that she left puddles in several of her vids - regardless if she wore high-knee boots in other vids. These are just a few not including even more others. If you read what I said, please read it to understand and not to react. Link to comment
shadowflake 216 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 Sigh, it's a shame to see her go. While leaving piss puddles for others to clean up is definitely unacceptable no matter how hot it may be to us, I think there's options to sidestep that issue. You don't have to flood your pants until they overflow. Or you can just wet yourself outside. Hell, you could go little by little and make sure you get outside before it starts dripping on the floor, how about that? The involvement of other people is trickier. Legally you might be in the clear if you blur out their faces, but it's still a moral issue to force your fetish onto other people. But there should be a wide range of roleplay scenarios to replace that. You could literally have someone play the stranger you meet on a walk. I don't know whether this is commercially viable, but it'd certainly be hot enough. Either way, I'm glad I got some or her vids when I did. Link to comment
WettingFan6969 45 Posted February 19, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 19, 2022 While I adored some of her content, and found her to be extremely attractive. Nonetheless, my personal perspective is a little different than the rest. To loop in TVGuy's analysis he is completely spot on. To make matters worse, she made content in places where I literally go with my family. It is not hypothetical, I literally live in one of the small towns where she filmed content. Without exposing any further, I dreaded the situation in which I could come across her filming whilst walking around with family and friends. Wetscarlet was a little less daring in most of her videos, but she also did the same things. Ironically, somehow filming in the same general area as Briana. In fantasy land, its a great scenario. super hot woman walking around and having an "accident". However, in reality it is extremely reckless. Worst of all, if somebody caught her and put on her social media she would most definitely face legal consequences. She is an adult, and that is her problem related to her choices. Undoubtedly, that situation would bring this fetish into an extremely unfavorable light. A simple googl search about her would bring general public/news media directly to this forum. This site is thankfully very legally aware, but we are still a taboo, niche fetish that needs to remain as such to avoid vilification. Not to go off on a rant, but the pee/wetting fetish is one of the most tame, least explicit fetishes. However, in many countries omorashi is illegal. Whereas, BDSM and bukkake is "ok". Rant over. Bottom line is, I will miss some of their content. However, it is for the better that she quit as she was unwilling to do videos in private settings. Briana quit because she couldn't do exhibitionistic content which turned her on. If it was about money, she would have been okay with doing sexy videos in her home or secluded parks etc. She never wanted to do customs, or engage with fans. She was all about the thrill of public exposure, and when that ability was taken away from her she rage quit. nwohdeh, Samikka, PrincelyDesire and 6 others 9 Link to comment
Hedonist 1,370 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 I'm surprised she lasted as long and made as many videos. Anytime I've seen her around here, it was basically to scold people for potentially ripping her videos. I understood the frustration, but in turn, it just felt like a bunch of guilt tripping drama so marks will buy up. Not everyone gets to make a full living in the porn business. Hate to be a hater (lol), but good riddance. Link to comment
Guest BigeBigeboye100 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 11 hours ago, aklong said: I believe you either misread or didn’t read my comment, I’m backing my statement with clear evidence that she left puddles in several of her vids - regardless if she wore high-knee boots in other vids. These are just a few not including even more others. If you read what I said, please read it to understand and not to react. Oh, that's my bad. I didn't realise you were the same person who had already commented before I replied . Sorry for that misunderstanding. But yeah, you're right about her leaving puddles regardless of the footwear. Link to comment
amasonbo1 515 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 1 hour ago, Hedonist said: Anytime I've seen her around here, it was basically to scold people for potentially ripping her videos. Either that, or asking for people to rip other people's videos for her. Double standard was very funny. Despguy123, omodaddy, roeroerowrow and 2 others 5 Link to comment
Recommended Posts