Jump to content
Existing user? Sign In

Sign In



Sign Up

What happened to Wet Brianna?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Piracy definitely is harmful to content creators, especially independent creators who rely on sites like Clips4Sale.  Imagine putting all that time and effort into making a video, only to sell 4 downl

Both Clips4Sale and ManyVids instituted a policy that any person appearing in videos, even in the background, needs to have some kind of consent form, or ID verification on file. Effectively, this kil

So, because it's not that big of a deal, you're okay with someone intentionally dumping their coffee on the floor, smiling smugly about it and then walking off? Because that's what you're implyin

Posted Images

37 minutes ago, amasonbo1 said:

Her videos were hot, but I did always feel weird about the fact that she's forcing others to watch her sexual acts without their consent, and also that she's leaving a mess for a bunch of poor retail workers that now have to clean up a grown women's urine because they like wetting on purpose in public. 

Same. I'm surprised she got as popular as she did considering every video was breaking the #1 rule of this community and violating consent.

Link to comment

I heard her complain of video piracy and was tired of fighting it.

I thought she had an account here?  Even if she isn't filming anymore, i figured she'd still communicate with us like-minded heathens 😛

I don't see why she wouldn't use the market place here?  I know that C4s is has a huge reach, but at least it is something.  Hard to say since I don't know her motivation.

Her content will be missed!

Link to comment
6 hours ago, amasonbo1 said:

 

Her videos were hot, but I did always feel weird about the fact that she's forcing others to watch her sexual acts without their consent, and also that she's leaving a mess for a bunch of poor retail workers that now have to clean up a grown women's urine because they like wetting on purpose in public. 

Exactly, end of the day she totally left huge piss puddles behind in several establishments for staff forced to clean up.  We all know she totally did not go back and clean it.  That part was not cool.  Personally I don’t care how hot the vid is, leaving piss puddles inside of public establishments isn’t the way.  This is a niche fetish - at the same time, have  some dignity & consideration.  She got mad and because she would rather piss her pants in line at Dairy Queen, leave a huge urine puddle for staff to clean instead of pissing her pants at home in private and make sell clips that way.  Unbelievable.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, aklong said:

Exactly, end of the day she totally left huge piss puddles behind in several establishments for staff forced to clean up.  We all know she totally did not go back and clean it.  That part was not cool.  Personally I don’t care how hot the vid is, leaving piss puddles inside of public establishments isn’t the way.  This is a niche fetish - at the same time, have  some dignity & consideration.  She got mad and because she would rather piss her pants in line at Dairy Queen, leave a huge urine puddle for staff to clean instead of pissing her pants at home in private and make sell clips that way.  Unbelievable.

There were some videos of her wearing long boots, don't leave a huge urine puddle, most of the piss get inside her boot.

Link to comment
10 hours ago, ero9007 said:

There were some videos of her wearing long boots, don't leave a huge urine puddle, most of the piss get inside her boot.

10 hours ago, ero9007 said:

There were some videos of her wearing long boots, don't leave a huge urine puddle, most of the piss get inside her boot.

I will allow evidence to speak for itself

Screenshot_20220218-084809.png

Screenshot_20220218-084851.png

Screenshot_20220218-084927.png

Screenshot_20220218-085132.png

Screenshot_20220218-085156.png

Screenshot_20220218-085254.png

Screenshot_20220218-085434.png

Link to comment

She was the hottest wetter I've seen. I agree that it's not nice for someone to have to pay for the clean-up, but for videos that hot, I don't really care. There's a trillion things going on in the world every split second, and there's a lot worse things going on in the world than a carpet tile in some bookshop back in 2020 getting some pee on it. If it was dangerous, that would be another story, like someone on crutches slipping on it. But I try not to think about hypothetical stuff like that when I'm watching these things. If anything, the naughtiness makes it hotter, and you don't get that level of peril in a bathtub wetting or a back garden wetting. I just wish I got more of her videos before they bit the dust, like all good things do these days.

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, aklong said:

No you don’t get the same thrill, but you gotta see it from the other side.  I mean, would you really want to clean up someone’s piss?  From them “purposely” leaving a puddle?  No one cares until it’s them.  Just saying this fetish should come with some consideration above pleasure.  But if anyone doesn’t see it that way, then have at it.  I’ve have had conversations with omo content makers on twitter and when this topic came up they felt & believed it was one of the most trifling & inhumane ways to make a video, by leaving piss puddles behind.  I’ve supported her store since she’s been around and when I kept noticing she left urine puddles everywhere, that’s totally not cool and signs of no character. This is not a fetish for everyone and many people of the world considers urine as disgusting because it’s bodily waste.  Hey, each their own tho!

I understand where you're coming from. It's definitely not a cool thing to do. But for me, I can let it go. I just can't get all that concerned about a random person on the other side of the world, two or three years ago, having to wipe up some pee on the floor at work. They probably don't even remember it after all this time, or didn't know it was pee anyway, as pee doesn't actually smell that much.

I used to get outraged on other people's behalf more, but then I learnt that some things just have to be let go. Now that we're all online, everything is amplified. Things that were once forgotten and moved on from, become trends, and campaigns, and political stances, and movements, and then a community gets divided into the ones that think something's okay and the ones that think something's not okay, and then there's drama and it's affecting people's mental health, and in the meantime, the person who had to wipe up a bit of pee at work a couple of years ago is now a team leader, has just bought their first house, and still doesn't know you exist. If you set up a JustGiving page, they wouldn't even click on the link. That's the sort of person they are. Probably.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, TVGuy said:

Piracy definitely is harmful to content creators, especially independent creators who rely on sites like Clips4Sale.  Imagine putting all that time and effort into making a video, only to sell 4 downloads, but have it pirated hundreds, or even thousands of times.  It is incredibly discouraging.

Modern video piracy online is no longer just customers sharing their favorite videos on various forums.  It has become an integral tool in international money laundering for giant crime syndicates.  Basically, it is how you can convert stolen credit card data, in bulk, to untraceable cash.  Going after large content creators would draw attention and a possible law enforcement response, but small time individuals posting on C4S and Only Fans?  Well, they make ideal targets for these kind of schemes.

 

Morality set aside, there are a number of legal issues she could be facing.  If someone else has to clean up after her, that could be considered vandalism. Not taking care of bodily waste of any kind and leaving it behind could fall under the category of offensive littering.  If anything she does causes another person to unwillingly come into contact with her urine, you have assault, and if someone is legitimately disturbed, disgusted, or offended by her actions, you have a case for harassment.

Now, I know some of you will likely argue that I am being ridiculous here.  That there is no difference between what she is doing and someone having a legitimate accident, and surely you can't charge someone who has a legitimate accident with such crimes.  But, under the law there is a difference because what she is doing is intentional.  For a crime to have been committed, there are two requirements- 1)Actus reus which is the physical criminal act itself.  This condition would be met by someone who has a legimate accident, as well as someone doing it intentionally for a video.  But the second condition 2)Mens rea is the intentional motivation behind the act, and the understanding on the culprits part that they were intentionally doing something that could have these outcomes.

And it's not like people haven't been criminally charged for such things before.  A video creator who went by the handle Leaky Lacie, who was most famously charged after her and her husband filmed themselves having sex on a ferris wheel, also faced numerous charges from videos where she urinated in a public elevator and on two vending machines.  In another, much older case, a woman was arrested after creating a video where she peed on new furniture in a store.  In that case, charges also included grand theft, due to the property damage.  While not in the US, there was also a case in Australia I read about where a 20 year old woman and her boyfriend were arrested after he filmed her peeing in her pants in a supermarket.  In all these cases, the videos that the suspects themselves produced were used as evidence against them.

Considering the nature off Wet Brianna's videos, I am not terribly surprised she would want to take them down.  I think if she were to have continued it would only have been a matter of time before she faced legal repercussions.  Even if she stopped making new videos, she could still face charges for leaving her old videos up.

This isn't a Clips4Sale or ManyVids policy.  It is the law-  USC Title 18.2257.  Specific proof of age records are required for any person appearing in any kind of an adult video-

Now, upon reading this law, you may be inclined to argue that Brianna's videos do not contain "actual sexually explicit conduct," but if we look at the law's definition of what that means it says-

 
Where this applies to these videos is in the court's interpretation of what includes lascivious exhibition of the public area.
 

Until recently, Clips4sale allowed content creators to check a box certifying that they were in compliance with USC 18.2257, but required no additional verification.

However, this recently changed.  After the fallout of the "GirlsDoPorn" atrocity, where the victims were continually harmed by the presence of their videos on sites like PornHub.  As a result of this, the US Government has expanded its regulations regarding record keeping.  Originally only requiring primary producers to keep and maintain proof of age records, the law now requires secondary producers, who host porn online, to also maintain a copy of these same records.

The law and Clips4sale have always required Brianna to keep these records.  Only now, her, and other producers, have to demonstrate that they are actually doing it in order to continue.

When TVGuy isn’t making amazing content he spends his spare time being an attorney. There was a lot of thought put into that response. Thanks!

Link to comment
4 hours ago, TVGuy said:

This isn't a Clips4Sale or ManyVids policy.  It is the law-  USC Title 18.2257.  Specific proof of age records are required for any person appearing in any kind of an adult video-

Thanks for correcting me, I knew about that specific law but I didn't know exactly how it applied. I hadn't realized that these stores weren't actually doing anything new per se, but instead tightening up what was already on the books.

Link to comment
Guest BigeBigeboye100
11 hours ago, aklong said:

I will allow evidence to speak for itself

Screenshot_20220218-084809.png

Screenshot_20220218-084851.png

Screenshot_20220218-084927.png

Screenshot_20220218-085132.png

Screenshot_20220218-085156.png

Screenshot_20220218-085254.png

Screenshot_20220218-085434.png

These aren't long boots, they're ankle boots. He was referring to boots that are knee length-ish.

Link to comment
Quote

 

On 2/17/2022 at 2:19 PM, amasonbo1 said:

Both Clips4Sale and ManyVids instituted a policy that any person appearing in videos, even in the background, needs to have some kind of consent form, or ID verification on file. Effectively, this kills the market for videos filmed in public, which was what 95% of her catalog was. Last I knew she was trying to figure out a way around this, but it seems she decided to just quit.

I do remember her mentioning this on her Twitter, which is now gone too, to which I replied saying that maybe she could move into doing videos that weren't set in public, or that somehow didn't show other people. She seemed to not like the idea of that.

Her videos were hot, but I did always feel weird about the fact that she's forcing others to watch her sexual acts without their consent, and also that she's leaving a mess for a bunch of poor retail workers that now have to clean up a grown women's urine because they like wetting on purpose in public. 

Why wouldn't she just blur others' faces as they do for JAVs filmed under Asian countries' oppressive privacy laws?

Edited by PoutyPoet (see edit history)
Link to comment
5 hours ago, BigeBigeboye100 said:

These aren't long boots, they're ankle boots. He was referring to boots that are knee length-ish.

I believe you either misread or didn’t read my comment, I’m backing my statement with clear evidence that she left puddles in several of her vids - regardless if she wore high-knee boots in other vids.  These are just a few not including even more others.  If you read what I said, please read it to understand and not to react.

Link to comment

Sigh, it's a shame to see her go.

While leaving piss puddles for others to clean up is definitely unacceptable no matter how hot it may be to us, I think there's options to sidestep that issue. You don't have to flood your pants until they overflow.  Or you can just wet yourself outside. Hell, you could go little by little and make sure you get outside before it starts dripping on the floor, how about that?

The involvement of other people is trickier. Legally you might be in the clear if you blur out their faces, but it's still a moral issue to force your fetish onto other people. But there should be a wide range of roleplay scenarios to replace that. You could literally have someone play the stranger you meet on a walk. I don't know whether this is commercially viable, but it'd certainly be hot enough.

Either way, I'm glad I got some or her vids when I did.

Link to comment

I'm surprised she lasted as long and made as many videos. Anytime I've seen her around here, it was basically to scold people for potentially ripping her videos. I understood the frustration, but in turn, it just felt like a bunch of guilt tripping drama so marks will buy up. Not everyone gets to make a full living in the porn business. Hate to be a hater (lol), but good riddance. 

Link to comment
Guest BigeBigeboye100
11 hours ago, aklong said:

I believe you either misread or didn’t read my comment, I’m backing my statement with clear evidence that she left puddles in several of her vids - regardless if she wore high-knee boots in other vids.  These are just a few not including even more others.  If you read what I said, please read it to understand and not to react.

Oh, that's my bad. I didn't realise you were the same person who had already commented before I replied . Sorry for that misunderstanding. But yeah, you're right about her leaving puddles regardless of the footwear.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...