Jump to content
Existing user? Sign In

Sign In



Sign Up

female New YouTube Channel


Recommended Posts

So I noticed a channel that's seems to be posting videos of themselves wetting. Or if they're taken from other places, I've haven't seen them myself.

Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC60_wOSCj9sML50_F878TuQ

I've uploaded the videos in case the channel gets taken down.

Link to comment

these vids are not from the same woman for sure.

i don't know why the heck people post fetish vids on youtube and expect them to last. also, it's not a good idea to post a direct link to the youtube channel, because google monitors which youtube links are posted on fetish sites like this and deletes the videos. 

good job backing up the vids tho 🙂

Link to comment
46 minutes ago, AquaVitae said:

Google does no such thing. Please stop spreading this myth.

if you believe it's a myth, fine. i believe it is entirely possible that something like that exists, judging that some videos, which have been on youtube for years, were taken down as soon as someone pu the link here. so i will continue warning people. it's easy to break the link apart and avoid that. but there's alrady a thread about that, so i won't go on.

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, AquaVitae said:

Yes. Youtube will regularly take down channels with NSFW content. But it has absolutely nothing to do with where it was linked. Breaking up the links is a practice that wastes the time of everyone involved and does absolutely nothing to prevent content removal. It still happens even when you do that.

how can you be so sure that doesn't happen? i don't think it's a coincidence that some videos are up on youtube for years, but get taken down when someone posts links. 

and how much time exactly do you lose by simply modding the link? 2, maybe 3 seconds and a few presses of a button. those practices are actually mandatory on many forum sites to hide the links to pirated content and make it unable to find unless you search manually for them, and it has been very effective. 

Edited by slovenc79 (see edit history)
Link to comment
3 hours ago, AquaVitae said:

Yes. Youtube will regularly take down channels with NSFW content. But it has absolutely nothing to do with where it was linked. Breaking up the links is a practice that wastes the time of everyone involved and does absolutely nothing to prevent content removal. It still happens even when you do that.

There's no way to know that unless you work at Google. From a technical standpoint, it's not so far-fetched. When you click on a link on website, your browser will send a referrer URL with your request. If you copy-paste or manually write an URL into the address bar, that doesn't happen. Google indexes pretty much the entire web and likely has algorithms to determine which sites are likely NSFW, so it's definitely possible they have a spam-filter like algorithm that flags videos for review if they get an influx of traffic from sites associated with porn. They already have all the data they need from their core business and referrer URLs, so it's not that much of a stretch. I've seen videos that have been up for years disappear within hours after being posted on this site. Coincidence? Possibly. It's possible that any influx in traffic on an old video marks it as suspicious, or that it just happened to be flagged by an automated review. But it's also possible it's not a coincidence.

There is a way for site owners to prevent this automatic referall URL being sent from links on the site. It's this tag:

<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">

This would instruct the browser to not send a referrer URL on any outbound links site-wide, making sabotaging links obsolete.

In any event, the best way to ensure that YT videos don't disappear is to archive them and upload them before posting the link. This should really be standard practice, but many people seem unwilling to learn how to do it even though there are websites that make it super easy.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/23/2020 at 3:39 AM, Maria-Sanza said:

There's already been a thread about the topic of linking Youtube videos from here and it's been discussed to death. As far as I'm concerned, there is no evidence that proves that linking a video from here will cause it to be taken down in the future.

 

I don't think YouTube gives a fuck where the link comes from. The reason the videos are taken down, is because there are some very active, let us call them YouTube-Nazis out there, with no other hobby than getting offended, and many probably think they're helping the society by reporting "inapropriate" content.

Link to comment
On 2/3/2020 at 4:37 AM, ed2 said:

One for the plough fetichists, or whatever. Experiment: Now let us see if this vanish soon.

 

how the heck would does this prove anything? even if there is a fetish-site-link detection, it's just a detection, and the vids are probably reviewed before deletion. no mod would ever flag this as sexual, even if they detected it's been shared on fetish sites or dozens of people reported it as sexual. because it isn't, and wetting videos are. 

if you really want to test it, post something that could actually be sexual and hasn't been detected yet. tho it's still impossible to know whether yt will detect it or that "secret anti-wetting nazi society" will report it. 

if this actually works tho, i'll post some justin bieber and billie eilish music vids 🙂

Link to comment
On 2/4/2020 at 5:08 PM, slovenc79 said:

how the heck would does this prove anything? even if there is a fetish-site-link detection, it's just a detection, and the vids are probably reviewed before deletion. no mod would ever flag this as sexual, even if they detected it's been shared on fetish sites or dozens of people reported it as sexual. because it isn't, and wetting videos are. 

if you really want to test it, post something that could actually be sexual and hasn't been detected yet. tho it's still impossible to know whether yt will detect it or that "secret anti-wetting nazi society" will report it. 

if this actually works tho, i'll post some justin bieber and billie eilish music vids 🙂

Yeah, it would be impossible to prove anything, this way or that. My point is just that I doubt YouTube cares where their videos get linked, it doesn't matter to them. I'm a member at another sex-related forum too, but it has a huge off-topic section where people can post anything, it is ALOT more videos there than in the sexual part of the forum.  It wouldn't make sense if all that generated an automatic report. I rather think most videos are taken down due to users reporting, DMCA-requests, and I'm quite sure they have algorithms that detect "shady" titles. Even copyrighted movies stay online for awhile if they've been creative with the title.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, ed2 said:

Yeah, it would be impossible to prove anything, this way or that. My point is just that I doubt YouTube cares where their videos get linked, it doesn't matter to them. I'm a member at another sex-related forum too, but it has a huge off-topic section where people can post anything, it is ALOT more videos there than in the sexual part of the forum.  It wouldn't make sense if all that generated an automatic report. I rather think most videos are taken down due to users reporting, DMCA-requests, and I'm quite sure they have algorithms that detect "shady" titles. Even copyrighted movies stay online for awhile if they've been creative with the title.

I've got a whole playlist of movies on Youtube to watch but most of those are obscure films that aren't too likely to get a DVD or streaming release anytime soon, so odds are pretty good those won't go down anytime soon. Especially since with obscure films the companies that made them are usually long out of business and the people that wrote and directed them are usually just happy when their films get seen at all.

I do find it weird and hypocritical that wetting and desperation videos seem to get taken down from Youtube WAY more often then videos that promote actual white supremacist viewpoints(and those violate the terms of service WAY more then some videos that some people might get turned on by).  Seriously there should be no universe in which a worthless bigoted piece of shit like Steven Crowder still has a channel but some random nobody gets theirs taken down just for posting a few wetting vids.

Edited by LifeIsStrange (see edit history)
Link to comment
1 hour ago, LifeIsStrange said:

I've got a whole playlist of movies on Youtube to watch but most of those are obscure films that aren't too likely to get a DVD or streaming release anytime soon, so odds are pretty good those won't go down anytime soon. Especially since with obscure films the companies that made them are usually long out of business and the people that wrote and directed them are usually just happy when their films get seen at all.

I do find it weird and hypocritical that wetting and desperation videos seem to get taken down from Youtube WAY more often then videos that promote actual white supremacist viewpoints(and those violate the terms of service WAY more then some videos that some people might get turned on by).  Seriously there should be no universe in which a worthless bigoted piece of shit like Steven Crowder still has a channel but some random nobody gets theirs taken down just for posting a few wetting vids.

Yeah, but then again YouTube isn't really the right platform to post plain wetting videos on in the first place.

Link to comment

YouTube doesn't allow porn, and wetting videos are porn. It's not hard to understand why they get taken down. You brought up terms of service, here they are:

"YouTube is not for pornography or sexually explicit content. If this describes your video, even if it's a video of yourself, don't post it on YouTube. Also, be advised that we work closely with law enforcement and we report child exploitation."

Wetting videos are pornography, they're intended to arouse and we jack off to them, so it's fairly unambiguous.

https://www.youtube.com/about/policies/#community-guidelines

Edited by PooSkirt (see edit history)
Link to comment

Yeah, we get it, YouTube takes down videos when this site links to them, totally, and we know because, er, well, it's not to far-fetched! YouTube certainly could do something like this! You don't know that they don't do it!

It's like talking to a conspiracy theorist. They'll be cock-sure they're right about vaccines, or 9/11, or cell phones giving you cancer... until you question them for evidence, then all of a sudden it's non-sequiturs, weird sources, and paranoia all the way.

 

On 2/5/2020 at 7:42 PM, ed2 said:

Yeah, it would be impossible to prove anything, this way or that.

To the contrary, if YT does/did do this, it'd be incredibly easy to prove. Just do what was done in this thread and link to lots of videos and see if they get taken down. The claim is that when we link to YT, the video goes away. If this was true, it'd be consistent and easy to demonstrate.

Edited by Hopeful (see edit history)
Link to comment
6 hours ago, Hopeful said:

To the contrary, if YT does/did do this, it'd be incredibly easy to prove. Just do what was done in this thread and link to lots of videos and see if they get taken down. The claim is that when we link to YT, the video goes away. If this was true, it'd be consistent and easy to demonstrate.

actually that's exactly how several yt wetting videos dissapeared - they were on yt undetected, some for years, but have been deleted as soon as somebody posted a (working) link here. that's how suspicion about this thing existing came up in the first place. 

as i said before, if detection like this exists, it serves only as detection to warn the moderators, not actually delete videos by itself. 

i don't see how you find it impossible for something like that to exist. if you find this website by google, it means it's indexed, marked as what it is and every visitor's ip is followed for various reasons like security and target advertising. there are algorithms internet giants use that seem sci-fi magic to us mortals, and creating an algorithm with a list of adult sites which would check for youtube links really doesn't seem like a big deal for them to make. 

there are many fetish forums with a rule that every link to (pirated) content MUST be modifyed in order to not be detected. also, the most original content you can find can only be found by browsing manually and not using search engines, because whatever might be found by a search engine has probably been found by copyright holders and removed before you even knew it was there. 

just like blindly believing a conspiracy theory is ignorant, so is blind denial (just because they're too lazy to delete a space or two to make link working again). i'm not saying i'm positive that this actually exists (and neither are you that it doesn't), but it's definitely possible, and i just stated my reasons why. and whether is exists or doesn't, the solution of modifying links may prevent that. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Hopeful said:

I don't see where I said it couldn't possibly be true. I pointed out there was a severe lack of evidence.

i kinda got that feeling while reading your sarcastic rant and comparing us to conspiracy theory lunatics. sadly you were too ignorant to read the rest of my post, where i pointed out i completely agree there isn't any strong evidence, but i presented indicators why i think it's pretty logical for something like that to exists and it isn't just some paranoia. 

edit: yea, ignorant, butthurt and rage downvote instead of trying to actually understand anything. way to go 🙂 there's no point debating the likes of you. sorry about the offtopic, mods, i'll shut up now.

Edited by slovenc79 (see edit history)
Link to comment
16 hours ago, Hopeful said:

To the contrary, if YT does/did do this, it'd be incredibly easy to prove. Just do what was done in this thread and link to lots of videos and see if they get taken down. The claim is that when we link to YT, the video goes away. If this was true, it'd be consistent and easy to demonstrate.

I concider it as good as disproved then.

Link to comment
  • 8 months later...
On 2/9/2020 at 12:22 PM, slovenc79 said:

i kinda got that feeling while reading your sarcastic rant and comparing us to conspiracy theory lunatics. sadly you were too ignorant to read the rest of my post, where i pointed out i completely agree there isn't any strong evidence, but i presented indicators why i think it's pretty logical for something like that to exists and it isn't just some paranoia. 

edit: yea, ignorant, butthurt and rage downvote instead of trying to actually understand anything. way to go 🙂 there's no point debating the likes of you. sorry about the offtopic, mods, i'll shut up now.

Yeah downvoting people just for disagreeing with you is just plain childish.

Link to comment
On 2/9/2020 at 7:22 PM, slovenc79 said:

edit: yea, ignorant, butthurt and rage downvote instead of trying to actually understand anything. way to go 🙂 there's no point debating the likes of you. sorry about the offtopic, mods, i'll shut up now.

Wow, dramatic much? On every other forums and comment thread I've been to, all the way back to the early days of YouTube, they've just been a way to express everything from disagreement to disapproval, and lets people gauge how many in the "room" agree or disagree with a post, which is useful on the Internet given we aren't in a room where you can just tell what people think from body language, or where you can do everything from just nodding or going "mhm" to tell others that you agree or disagree. Just leaving a like or dislike is much more efficient in such a setting than typing out a whole reply when all you want/need is express disagreement.

But if you for some reason interpret it as "rage", as part of a "rant", and take such offense to it, I'll refrain from doing it to you in the future. I hope you weren't too traumatized.

Edited by Hopeful (see edit history)
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...