raspro 197 Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 Have a look at this Japanese fetish site for new videos. Sorry, for got to include link. http://www.akibacom.jp/english/products/list.php?name=wetting&search.x=15&search.y=8 Regards, Raspro Quote Link to comment
Kyuu 6,097 Posted July 24, 2014 👑 Administrator Share Posted July 24, 2014 Last screenshot you posted, http://www.akibacom.jp/english/products/detail.php?product_id=47540 > 8,000 yen $80 for this one alone. Ow. Quote Link to comment
Person7 50 Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 $80?? for a fucking fetish video? Feature length movies, with multi-million dollar budgets, dont even cost that much on DVD. Thats absolutely insane. Kei, Kyuu and GlassCityGuy 3 Quote Link to comment
rachelkirwan 13,627 Posted July 24, 2014 🌟 OmoOrg VIP Share Posted July 24, 2014 It should be out on a streaming site in 6 weeks, or so, this is usually how it works. I would not spring. Although the first one looks pretty hot :) Oh and to put it in context, 80$ is like a quality sex toy.... just saying... ;) Quote Link to comment
Jeanette 168 Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 Oh and to put it in context, 80$ is like a quality sex toy.... just saying... ;) The best sex toy I ever bought was about $20. It was far more pleasurable and durable than another one I spent $70 on. Just saying, there are some surprising finds out there. I agree $80 is not at all unreasonable for a fetish video though. Quote Link to comment
Kyuu 6,097 Posted July 25, 2014 👑 Administrator Share Posted July 25, 2014 To be fair those multi-million dollar budget films also sell like wildfire, fetish videos not so much. $80 is ridiculous for a low-quality budget fetish video. If it actually looked like a really good quality production clip, I probably wouldn't complain. But they can't even bother to include any sample images for that $80 clip either. Or video details, like the quality, resolution, or anything. For $80 I should at least be getting something recorded with a decent quality camera, but I'm betting it's probably a lower bitrate 640x480 film like most. The first screenshots video does look good though and is a much more reasonable $38. I might actually consider buying that. Quote Link to comment
Person7 50 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 (edited) Selling less copies doesn't justify a ridiculous price. If its not worth it, its not worth it, and a fetish video will never be worth $80 in my eyes. Might as well pay a cam whore to play out scenarios for you at that point. But alas, everyone values things differently I guess. Edited July 26, 2014 by Person7 (see edit history) Kei 1 Quote Link to comment
Riptide101 180 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Not really worth, but if you have spare cash might as well spend it on something. Quote Link to comment
TVGuy 10,658 Posted July 26, 2014 🌟 OmoOrg VIP Share Posted July 26, 2014 It is hard to make money when your audience is limited. You either have to charge more or lower production costs to make a profit. I run into this in my mainstream video production business as well as with HD Wetting. With mainstream videos I often do events where I make my money by selling a copy of the event to attendees. If a concert only has 50 people at it, and I only make $10 profit on selling the DVD, that is a max of $500 if everyone buys it. But if my production costs are higher than that, I'm not making anything. I face this same kind of issue with HD Wetting- Trying to balance how much I can spend on production to get the highest quality, without increasing the price so much that no one can afford it. People want quality, but they also want low cost. Balancing those two can be really tough. For me it is all about value- I might not be able to offer HD Wetting memberships at the cheapest cost. And quality could be way higher if I only made one video a month. What I try to do is provide the best value, the best combination of quality, number of updates, and price that I can. $80 is quite a bit of money, but if they are offering a lot of value for that $80 it might be worth it. Kei 1 Quote Link to comment
jc22jc 68 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 $80 is a lot for something to watch while you are touching yourself. Judging from the screenshots these videos dont appear to be particularly big budget or high quality. If they are using famous highly paid actresses, its wasted on me because I dont recognize them. I think Ill wait until they are available for free. On here hopefully. Normally If I genuinely think they are worth the price I will pay for them afterwards. But usually they are a disappointment. Quote Link to comment
Kyuu 6,097 Posted July 27, 2014 👑 Administrator Share Posted July 27, 2014 Here's the first part of the first one, https://omorashi.org/files/file/2533-おもらしロ○ータ-part-1/ Quote Link to comment
tmoa1212 65 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Here's the first part of the first one, I may be a bit out of date in my programs but back in the day, I used to rip some streams using a program I think was called getASFstream. I am pretty sure the stream (who's name I won't mention) used to use DRM but we're talking almost 10 years ago. I don't know how much things have changed since then or if there are better programs out there but I recommend considering this option if you want to minimize quality loss instead of using screen capturing. The program I used wasn't easy and wasn't really well translated but you seem well versed in computers and technology so I doubt you'll have problems if you consider this option. Quote Link to comment
Kyuu 6,097 Posted July 28, 2014 👑 Administrator Share Posted July 28, 2014 Oh no, it wasn't a web stream, it was a WMV download, and the download was encrypted and DRM locked using a service by Microsoft. I spent hours trying to find a way to break it without needing to resort to screen capturing, but ended up having to accept that it was probably going to be pretty much impossible, or at the very least was going to take way more time and effort than it was worth. There are tools such as FairUse4WM and FreeMe2 for this, but all are out of date and do not work with the latest version of IBX, which is pretty much forced before you can play any of the DRM protected files. The videos are really not worth such extreme effort to begin with. They're decent at best, and it's not like they were in amazing crystal clear HD quality to start with. I did a screen capture at twice the bitrate of the input file (which itself was bloated like almost all WMV videos are) before re-encoding it for upload here, so there really isn't a huge quality loss. I know there's always some quality loss when using this method, but it is what it is. It's the best I can do. Thanks for the tip though. Quote Link to comment
Seneca 214 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 You guys kidding, a few months back we were excited over phone-cam grabs off YouTube - this is gold, THANKS A MILLION FOR THE UPLOAD and the ENGINEERING, I'd watch it through a beer bottle! Quote Link to comment
sobebomb 204 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Just waiting for part two now cause that girl in the white shorts in the beginning. ..I was waiting for that one lol but I loved the video! Beautiful girls doing that. ... such awesomeness! Quote Link to comment
jc22jc 68 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Oh no, it wasn't a web stream, it was a WMV download, and the download was encrypted and DRM locked using a service by Microsoft. I spent hours trying to find a way to break it without needing to resort to screen capturing, but ended up having to accept that it was probably going to be pretty much impossible, or at the very least was going to take way more time and effort than it was worth. There are tools such as FairUse4WM and FreeMe2 for this, but all are out of date and do not work with the latest version of IBX, which is pretty much forced before you can play any of the DRM protected files. The videos are really not worth such extreme effort to begin with. They're decent at best, and it's not like they were in amazing crystal clear HD quality to start with. I did a screen capture at twice the bitrate of the input file (which itself was bloated like almost all WMV videos are) before re-encoding it for upload here, so there really isn't a huge quality loss. I know there's always some quality loss when using this method, but it is what it is. It's the best I can do. Thanks for the tip though. Thanks for doing that! I used to use fairuse4WM back in the day. That was a pain but what you are doing there is exponentially more involved. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.