ragtime

@TVGuy Thanks for the extra details! Moving all that stuff around with just a few PAs is pretty impressive, as is your lighting design in general. Compressed air inside of a stand sounds rad, especially to someone who has had to personally adjust big fresnel lights. I know about the orange-teal thing, but I guess it just never occurred to me in thinking about it that way for porn vids. Your attention to detail, as always, is impressive, as is your willingness to share information with us. It makes sense that the property owners would be in the kink scene themselves in some way, but do they ever balk at specific nature of your videos? Even kinky people (who aren't into pee play) might have some hesitation about letting models pee about their properties, even with a proliferation of puppy pads, plastic sheeting, and all-purpose cleaner.

Great job, @Roxanne! The beginning/middle/end aspect others have pointed to really contributes to making this not only highly intimate (albeit anonymous), but satisfying. The inevitability of your pee washing across the towel was a true spectacle, and I'm glad that it arrived a second time toward the end. You contained oceans inside you, which could not be contained. Thanks for sharing this highly personal act.

That is such an interesting room shape, ideal for making movies. Did you rent this for the shoot? Or is this your set? I'd imagine that location scouting requires some sensitivity. All of what you've shared recently, btw, in that crazy forest, has been gorgeous location-wise (obvi, the talent is too). Perhaps my eyes are failing, but that fixture that is high up and undiffused is on a fairly lightweight stand. I never thought about it until now, but I'd imagine that lighter gear is necessary for a shoot like this where presumably you don't have a G&E crew to haul around c-stands. Also, I'm curious about the mixed lighting temps here (if they are mixed and I'm not just getting the blue from the window and warmth of the woodtones mixed up). Thanks for indulging curious minds with these bts posts. Sorry if this post is too in the weeds.

Phenomenal vid! Thnx for sharing, and I hope you continue to see your courage increased!

Thanks for bringing this back to the fore. That video is great, and the artist has a well-articulated explanation of it here. She actually produced this as part of a series exploring types of low-key fetish content (sneezing, crushing, bubblegum, shampoo, etc) made possible by youtube/web 2.0. The pee video was the only one to get reported as porn, booting her project from the site.

What is this a fanfic of? Carnival rides the concept, or something else of which you are a fan?

Thanks for share. To rip, use VideoDownloader extension on Firefox. Here's an mp4. Japanese swimsuit poop - ThisVid.com.mp4

Not even into dudes, but that was tight! I hope that all your flights, whether in or out of the nation's second-largest state, involve nice-looking, suited men struggling to maintain continence. I hope, too, that you post all the time.

Good fishing, better story!

I know that you are asking for advice, but I have to ask the question: Why would you want to wet yourself at work? You suggest you don't want "it" to be too obvious, meaning you want it to be at least a little obvious, to, what, up the chances of getting caught? I'm racking my brain, but I cannot fathom why you would want to do something that if done right will get you at best just humiliated, but at worst fired and branded a pervert (maybe even arrested). Imagine if this were an exhibition forum instead and the question were, how can I show penis at work and jerk it in a semi-public place, just a little bit, so that it's not too obvious. Imagine if you did get caught. Imagine what other forum members might say. Imagine what the general public, bosses, coworkers, police, family, and friends would say. Maybe I'm wrong, but even exhibitionists would be concerned with losing their jobs and shunned professionally. What appeal does wetting your pants at work have? Like, seriously, can someone explain why this is something people would want to do at work? Are you just independently wealthy and don't need employment? Do you have a desire to be a social outcast and unprofessional? If you need to piss yourself so bad while out and about, what part of wearing a diaper to work to keep your private pleasures private is intolerable? By all means, I can get the appeal of public wetting. Not my bag IRL, but it is tantalizing fantasy fodder—where it does not carry consequences. I can even imagine circumstances where it would be alright in actual public, perhaps away from people I know with a conspiratorial partner. But public wetting that carries with it financial insecurity and the loss of respect of your peers? I do not understand at all.

Dang, you made her tell the staff! That's cold, unless that was part of the game...

Thanks for sharing this cool game of intimacy! Was your gf into omo pre-you, or is she just down? Either way, very fun. Would love some pix if your gf is ok with them shared!

@kochel428 Hella good analysis! I'm glad I can come to my favorite adult site and get some aesthetic critique on the side. I am personally drawn to the peeing art stuff, besides my own cathexis of wetting, because it is such a provocative act. It can revel in abjection. It can uncover private shame. It can dismantle shame. In this case, with the title being Transbordação, which means "Overflow," seems to be, according to Smék, about transforming the private, habitual act of releasing urine into a sublime experience by disrupting its utter banality in a public way. But it is also the overflowing of one body into the next, as @kochel428 describes, where the puddles flow into one another. What makes something like this exciting is that regardless of what Smék intended, we all, upon seeing this performance, bring with us our own series of affects and memories that complicate the more or less serene image of a bunch of women peeing their pants while breathing calmly: humiliation, disgust, arousal, relief, dismay, shock, humor.

This kind of thing is right up my alley! Thanks for sleuthing down this wetting art!

After a truly dumb excavation, I think I've confirmed that Cat Chaser Conspiracy, at least as a musical act, existed. No confirmation for the peeing. Here's the trail and attached is perhaps the only known song featuring "Moppet" the CCC model from WetSet. This is very long, sad, and has a disturbing revelation at the end. Read at your own risk. 1. Cat Chaser Conspiracy was founded by so-called FastCat and Cresta, but Moppet joined the band in 1997 at 14: and 2. FastCat went by the following aliases: Adam d'Ravin, Adam Marlowe, J.R. Ploughman, Jesse Lee Cantrell, and I also know his real name, though I hesitate to post it here. 3. When you search Cat Chaser Conspiracy, you also get the following page of one Adam d'Ravin, with a long, sad story about the band. Here is an excerpt (relevant parts in bold): 4. I should have followed that trail first, but didn't, partly because the Angelfire site hurt my eyes. But I did go down another weird path and found the Ploughman alias. J.R. Ploughman was a gnostic-minded Holy Grail conspiracy-theorist, and contributed to a book about it. From the about the authors section for the The Book of the Holy Grail, supposedly authored by Joseph of Arimethea and translated by the third president of these United States, with an introduction by Ploughman: Ploughman also made civil war boots, and uses a FastCat email in the Civil War reenactor community of 1998: Apparently he did a great job making period boots using the practices of the time. 5. FastCat went by Jesse Lee Cantrell. From his 2006 blog: 6. Through a combination of search terms, I have determined that FastCat has died this year. 7. Attached is the track "Bloodlust" with Moppet AKA JenniferLynn on vocals. It appears on the Cat Chaser Conspiracy CD A Little Taste of Pussy—More to Cum. This is where the alias Adam Marlowe is attached, in the description of the song: 8. Here's the most disturbing part of all of this. FastCat sought to marry Moppet in 1998, according to his own telling, but ran into a problem in that she was merely 15 and needed parental permission. By 1998, Wet Set had published up to issue 20. Meaning that Moppet appeared in Wet Set when she was either 14 or 15 for the first time. Unsurprisingly, you cannot buy issue 15 anymore, the one she first appears in. Number 24 came out before April 1999, which means that Moppet was probably still under 18 in that issue. The first Moppet photoset, 83, came out sometime in 2000, like also underage. You can still purchase this one (and 24). bloodlustgothic+bloodlust.mp3