TVGuy

Thanks! But technically, not a photo shoot. These are frames from a video.

Alisha pees in her jeans while she is masturbating in this sexy video. Needing to pee always makes Alisha horny. So, in this scene, when she needs to pee, she starts masturbating instead of going to the bathroom. When her need to pee grows to the point that holding it becomes difficult, she lets go, wetting her pants while she continues rubbing herself.

Personally, I haven't changed anything. Sosha is now producing all of the content for HD Wetting and HD Diapers so that I can have more time to focus on my mainstream video production business.

Actually, in the beginning, all we had was Mikki and Haydee. It was a long time before we brought in any other models. When it comes to producing this kind of content, it isn't even just about finding models who enjoy the activity we're shooting. If that was the case, they could easily film themselves and open their own Clips4sale store. The challenge is putting together the right team, not just models, but the crew as well, who work well together, and look forward to doing the shoots. It is true, businesses don't get much smaller than we are. Haha... "wet coast" haha 😄 Yeah, cost wise we can't compete on price with sites that produce their videos in Eastern Europe. You can hire models and crew in that region for only a small percentage of what we have to pay. And don't even get me started on the costs involved with legal compliance. Ultimately, HD Wetting is more of a hobby than a business. Our primary goal isn't to make as much money as possible, but to make the most authentic and genuine videos we can. Also, I don't think that when you look at what you actually get with a membership it is that expensive. It works out to less than 3 cents per video, which is a fantastic deal compared to Clips4sale or other types of sites. Even if you are only considering the new content that gets published every month, not the back catalog, you are still paying just a bit more than $4 per update, which is still a lot better than a lot clip sites charge. Many former Soviet countries are quite economically depressed. This makes it possible to hire models and crew for not very much money. However, one could argue that this is taking advantage of people based on their economic situation. Even $50 USD could be a life-changing amount of money. On the hand, you could argue that the producer is giving the girls in these videos an opportunity to earn this kind of money, when otherwise such opportunities simply wouldn't exist. At a certain point, it is easier to make more money by keeping costs low and producing more content. Improving arbitrary things like dialog, or production quality, is hard to translate into financial performance. If your goal is to make money, you are better off producing as much content as cheaply as possible. That is too bad. I actually tend to enjoy discussing content and content production with users of HD Wetting. Stay tuned... We are working on some exciting stuff behind the scenes at HD Wetting. It is a long term project, but once complete I really think we'll be setting an entirely new standard for wetting content and how people consume such content. Thank you!

Sosha and Alisha have fun flashing teasing glimpses of their diapers at the camera in this enticing photo gallery. Featuring a truly huge selection of high-resolution photographs, over 220, this stunning gallery is a diaper lover's dream. It features the absolutely gorgeous Sosha and Alisha posing together as they playfully tease the camera with glimpses of their pull-on style diapers. In the later photos in the gallery they both take their pants all the way off, fully revealing their diapers. With views of their diapers nu-obscured, they continue to show off, clearly having fun.

When Sosha complains about being bored, Alisha tickles them until they pee in their pants, then goes down on them, in this video. In this scene we find Alisha and Sosha in bed together. Sosha complains about being bored, so Alisha decides to start a tickle war, thinking this will make things less boring. Being very ticklish, it doesn’t take long before Sosha pees in their pants. Alisha responds by taking off Sosha’s pants and performing oral sex on them.

Alisha pees in her tights jeans and purple panties in this giant photo set. Featuring nearly 200 unique photographs, this gallery features Alisha showing off her tight jeans. Under her jeans, she is wearing purple panties. After showing off for the camera she pees in her pants, thoroughly soaking them. She then removes her wet jeans, exposing her soaked panties.

One thing that I have learned is that omo videos, since they are very much an impulse buy, tend to sell best when there are fewer barriers and options to purchase. The more purchase options I provide, the more I ask the user to think before making a purchase, the less likely they are to continue through and make the purchase. So I really don't want to have options where the user has to decide if they want to purchase a limited number of views, or the entire video, or purchase at a certain quality, or anything like that. I do understand your concern about buyer remorse, but there are a few things I am doing to combat that- Previews will be much more extensive than compared with the current HD Wetting site, including video previews for every scene, more scene images, and trailers for longer form videos. The pricing structure for credits and how credits translate to the cost of the video is going to be much more economically favorable to the user when compared with your typical pay-per-clip site. Right now, on HD Wetting, if you look at the cost of a membership on HD Wetting, it comes out to just under three cents per video. Compare that with something like Clips4sale, where a typical scene might be between $5 - $10. I intend for the pricing structure to work out on the new site so that if you do choose to purchase credits, you'll be paying what will be much closer to HD Wetting's current three cents per video than something like Clips4sale. So, even if you do not like a video, you wouldn't have thrown away a bunch of money on it. A customer support option will always be to refund the credits spent on a video. If you buy a video, and it turns out that you really didn't like it and wasn't what you expected, you'll be able to contact customer support and request a refund. As long as too much time hasn't passed since you purchased the video, you haven't watched it dozens of times, and you don't have a history of requesting refunds on every video you purchase, then you'll be able to get refunded. There will be a transition period to handle moving existing customers onto the new platform. But, any existing members of HD Wetting, when the switch to the new platform occurs, will be able to continue to login the classic HD Wetting members' area and view all the content, and continue to get all the new updates, just as they do now, until they reach the end of their membership period. Once the new platform is up and running, new signups for HD Wetting will be disabled and users with recurring HD Wetting memberships will have their memberships set to not renew at the end of their current membership period. So, all the current members will continue to receive everything they paid for. On top of that, members who have a current active membership to HD Wetting will get a huge amount of credits when they sign up for a membership on the new platform, and they will have the option of subscribing to a credit package that will cover all of the new content coming out, allowing them to enjoy all the new videos for a low monthly subscription cost, and have a back catalog of older videos, just like they did on the classic HD Wetting membership site.

Since they can't rule out that a crime wasn't committed using anything that they seized, it is still considered evidence. So, no, I can't get any of it back until they are sure that it wasn't used in the commission of any crime. But, that ruling never happens in reality- A possible crime was alleged, this stuff might be evidence, so there are only two things that could happen- 1) They prosecute the crime, anything seized no longer has evidentiary value, so it is sold off at a police auction or 2) No crime is ever prosecuted, so they hold on to the possible evidence forever, in case something needs to be investigated as a cold case at some future point. I had enough evidence of her involvement that I was able to get a no-contact order from the courts. If she tries to contact me, or has someone else contact me on her behalf, or does anything to impact me in any way she would be in violation of the no-contact order and could go to jail. Don't worry, her behavior hasn't influenced how I feel about women in general. I fully recognize that both men and women can be terrible people. There were plenty of warning signs with her that I ignored. When we first met she bragged to me that she could control her ex-boyfriend, getting him to do anything she wanted. She said this was because she slept with him when she was 16 and he was 18, so if he didn't do what she said, she could report him to the police for statutory rape. Her ability to manipulate and control others, to get whatever she wanted, was a point of pride for her and something she actively bragged about. She drove a very nice, customized, Toyota Celica that she was able too manipulate her father into buying for her. To her, this car was a kind of trophy of her ability to manipulate. Later in our relationship she successfully forced me to buy her a new car, threatening to expose my fetish and the early content I created for HD Wetting to my family, my coworkers, and the company I worked for, if I didn't go along with it. I'm not going to do any kind of third party ads like this. Allowing external code to run on a site is dangerous, and third party ads often harvest user data. Protecting user privacy is of primary importance to me, so I will not ask users to put their data at risk in exchange for credits. Referring new members is one way users will be able to earn free credits. If those users purchase paid credits, the user who refers them will also get bonus credits as a result of that purchase. Once you purchase a video with credits, at any membership level (including free), that video will be available to watch forever, and unlimited number of times. You won't have to spend credits for views. Limiting the number of views in any way would only limit the amount of time people spend on the site, which would limit the opportunities they have to be tempted to spend money. The way I'm building it, there won't really be a free membership and a premium membership. Instead, every membership will be free in that you can sign up, get an initial amount of credits, and have various ways to earn more credits, all for free. You will also have the opportunity to spend money to get credits, or subscribe to credit packages, but the memberships themselves are all the same. Very much like with mobile games there will be various rewards for different things, like just spending a certain amount of time on the site will earn credits, logging in a certain number of days in a row will earn credits, rating and commenting on content will earn credits. And, of course, the more money you spend, the more rewards and bonuses you will get. But, the membership itself will be free and never expire. The subscriptions available will be to credit packages. So, the equivalent of a full HD Wetting membership would be to subscribe to a credit package that gives you enough credits every month to purchase all the new content that is coming out. But, if you stop your credit package subscription, you will still have your membership where you can login and view all the videos you purchased with credits previously. This is my exact reasoning for wanting to change up how the site operates- So I can do different kinds of content, including long form content. Having credits be spent on each and every video will clearly let me see what kind of content users value, as well as let me know how many credits I need to price a video at to make it worth it. I don't want to have extra bonus charges like this- It excludes users, and only complicates pricing structures. Content that requires a greater investment to produce will simply cost more credits.

This week the US Supreme Court is taking up the issue of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Specifically, the court is looking at two cases, and their decision could be the end of Section 230. In this post I'm going to try to explain exactly what Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is, why it is important, and why you should care. Additionally, I'm going to look at some of the arguments around Section 230, specifically those who oppose it. Before Section 230 communications companies generally fell into one of two categories: You had your publishes and your providers. Publishers were most companies that published content, from newspapers to TV broadcasters. Since they had control over the content they published, they could also be held legally liable for that content. If they published or broadcast something intentionally false, or harmful, they could be sued, or even criminally liable, depending on the situation. On the other hand, communications providers, like telephone companies, simply provided a way for messages/data to move between points. They exercised no editorial control over these messages, so they couldn't be held liable for anything someone said on a phone call. Even if they were engaging in illegal activity on the phone, the phone company itself couldn't be held responsible for the illegal activity of its users. Section 230 created a new kind of communications company, the online service provider. This was something between a publisher and a service provider. Under Section 230 an online service provider, such as a website, couldn't be held liable for what the users of the service do. Just like communications providers couldn't be held liable for what their customers did on their networks. However, Section 230 also allows for online service providers to exercise editorial control. A website, such as Omorashi.org, can decide to delete content that is against their rules or their standards, while at the same time being legally shielded from any liability due to their user's activity. If I were to post something that were to libel another user here, that user could sue me, but they wouldn't be able to sue Omorashi.org. This law came about as a reaction to a couple of earlier court cases. One of these cases was Cubby v. CompuServe- The plaintiff sued CompuServe over an allegedly defamatory newsletter that had been posted to a CompuServe forum that resulted in him being fired from his job. The court found that since CompuServe exercised no editorial control or moderation of these forums that they had no reason to know of the alleged defamation and dismissed the case. The other case was Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy -- Yes, that Stratton Oakmont of The Wolf of Wall Street fame. If you ever watched The Wolf of Wall Street then you know that Stratton Oakmont was a giant Ponzi scheme. As investors started to figure this out, they posted their suspicions on the Prodigy forums. Stratton Oakmont sued Prodigy, saying these posts were false, amounted to libel, and wanted to hold Prodigy accountable. In this case, the judge found that Prodigy was liable for the activity of its users. Because Prodigy attempted to moderate their forums, to make them more family friendly, and would promote certain content, the judge found this meant Prodigy was acting as a publisher and thus was accountable for the information they published. As a result of these two cases, the message to online service providers was clear: If you attempt any kind of moderation, you can be held legally liable for anything that slips through the cracks. The only way service providers could protect themselves was to take a hands off approach and not moderate anything at all. For those of you who are old enough to remember, and were using the internet back then, you might remember how easy it was to accidentally stumble upon disturbing, and even illegal content on forums back then. Child pornography, graphic gory images, and tons of pirated software littered forums back then. You didn't even have to be looking for it, you could just stumble across it while looking for something completely unrelated. I experienced this myself when looking at the SeaQuest DSV BBS. Most people were not in favor of this legal landscape when it came to online content moderation. So this was the purpose of Section 230, to make it safe for sites to try and moderate their user content while protecting them from liability. As a result of Section 230, websites based on user generated content have been able to thrive. Every modern forum, all social media, and video sharing sites like Youtube. So that is the background behind Section 230.... Why, considering this, would anyone be against it? Well, there are several reasons. But, one of the biggest reasons is that many people feel big sites, like Youtube and Twitter, have too much power and are too central to how ideas spread. That allowing these sites to exercise editorial control allows them to selectively allow certain ideas, while blocking others. In the US, conservatives especially accuse large websites of censoring conservative ideas and speech. There are other arguments around the idea that these platforms should be liable for content they fail to moderate. In one of the cases the Supreme Court is currently looking at a young man's family is suing Youtube. They argue that Youtube didn't remove videos that radicalized the terrorists who killed him, so Youtube should be partially liable for his death. On one hand, you have people who want to do away with Section 230 so they can post whatever they want without having it be blocked or removed. The other group against section 230 seems like they want things to remain the same, they just want to be able to sue when companies are not doing a good enough job moderating their content. What would the consequences be? If Section 230 were actually to be struck down, many people think this would be the end of the internet. This is based on historical precedent. As we have removed legal shields for certain kinds of websites, we have simply seen those websites vanish. For example, COPPA didn't result in websites for children becoming safer, it resulted in websites for children vanishing. Almost every website, even those targeting younger users, have language requiring users to be at least 13 years old. Before COPPA various companies, Disney, Nickelodeon, AOL, all had sites designed for very young users, but COPPA made the risk of running such sites too great and these companies all decided it wasn't worth it. Similarly, FOSTA didn't force sites like Backpage or Craigslist Personals to change, it forced them to shut down. The liablity risk was too great, and those kind of sites no longer exist. The fear is the same thing that happened with COPPA and FOSTA would happen if Section 230 was struck down by the court. That it would be too legally perilous to operate a site that allowed user generated content. Sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube would likely have no choice but to stop allowing users to post content. Now, you might be thinking wouldn't things just simply return to a pre Section 230 type landscape, where these sites could continue to operate, just they wouldn't be able to moderate their content? Well, the answer is no. Here is the problem- Other laws that have come into existence since then require certain kinds of moderation. The aforementioned COPPA and FOSTA among them, not to mention the good old DMCA. Because these laws require a certain level of proactive moderation, websites wouldn't be able to just take a hands off approach and be protected the way CompuServe was back in the early '90s. They would be forced to be classified as publishers and be legally liable for the content posted by their users. Liberals would be able to sue sites that hosted content by conservatives that liberals felt was false, misleading, or harmful. Conservatives would be able to sue sites that hosted content by liberals that they felt was false. Anyone who got COVID could sue Twitter for allowing posts that included misinformation about COVID vaccines and anti-vaxers would be able to sue websites that posted pro-vaccine information. It is hard to imagine how websites could survive in such an environment, and if the past is any indication, they probably won't. This could be the end of sites that allow user generated content. At this point some of you may be thinking, "OK, but this is a US law, can't websites simply operate outside of the US?" That is a good point, and while the answer would technically be an affirmative, the reality is that when it comes to the internet, policy has a surprisingly far reach. This is because so much of the internet's infrastructure touches places that are under US jurisdiction at some point. Most large sites down are served via Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) which are reliant on servers in the US. Many of the most popular top level domains (.com .net) are under US jurisdiction. Plus you have the banking and financial infrastructure these sites depend on. The US Supreme Court gets to choose which cases it hears. Section 230 has been the law for over two decades now, and consistently upheld by the lower courts. So, this isn't a matter of conflicting precedent where the court is going to weigh in. That they have decided to take up these cases challenging Section 230 is a strong indicate that the court is posed to strike it down.

The authorities received an anonymous report that I was involved with the production and distribution of material involving underage people. Based on this anonymous report, a warrant was obtained. Though I can't be absolutely certain, the timing of when the report was, and certain details alleged in the report, have led me to believe that an ex-girlfriend of mine was behind the allegations. We had a disagreement over money- She believed she was entitled to a portion of everything I earned, even after we split up, because of the emotional support she provided when we were together. I disagreed with this, and she made various threats and gave me various ultimatums. The timing of when the report was filed is extremely suspicious when cross referenced with her threats and ultimatums. Also, I can't think of any reason anyone else would have to file such a report. I believe the search warrant likely would have been found illegal if it were ever challenged. My state's supreme court, just before the warrant was served, heard a case on the constitutionality of search warrants and created a new specificity test to ensure warrants were not unconstitutionally broad. Essentially, search warrants had to specificity exactly what evidence they hoped to find, where they hoped to find it, and why they believed that evidence was there. The warrant used in my case didn't seem to even come close to passing any of the requirements of the new specificity test. Additionally, the seized computers and servers from my office. This location was not listed on the warrant, so even outside of the warrants legality, it seemed that their search and seizure went beyond what was authorized. Further, my state has specific legal protections for internet service providers when it comes to search warrants and seizures. Since I was hosting not just my own site, but sites for paying customers, I should have qualified as a service provider under the law, and while they would have been legally able to image the server's drives, under the laws of my state, they should not have been able to seize the servers themselves without a specific court order authorizing them to do so, something they did not have. However, after a three year investigation no evidence of wrongdoing or criminality was ever found. Because the prosecution never claimed any evidence was found as a result of this search or warrant, I never had the opportunity to challenge the warrant's legality.

It is sort of difficult to explain all what I'm planning on doing, it would be much easier to show you when its all working, but I'll do my best- Right now the best way I have to attract new members is by giving away free content. I have to do this on a somewhat regular basis, posting videos here on the Omorashi.org forums and elsewhere. While I'm happy to continue doing this, it isn't optimal for converting viewers of this free content to new paying members. So, with the site redesign my first focus is going to be on becoming a content destination, even for people who aren't paying. Users will be able to sign up for free and enjoy a constant trickle of free content. This will be based on a kind of credit system, where the free users themselves will get to select what scenes they are interested in viewing. With those scenes that they select they will be able to enjoy the full suite of features the new site will offer, including organizing content into custom play lists. The scenes they select will be theirs to view online anytime they wish, as many times they want, and in full quality. There will also be social features, and certain interactions will be gamified and provide rewards, including additional credits for more videos. I expect the vast majority of users of this new site will be free users. But, my hope is that they will be encouraged to spend more time with the site this way, and thus be tempted by additional content that they will only get by paying. As far as paying members go, they of course will enjoy access to much more content. And, by keeping their memberships active, they will get additional bonuses, including savings, to reward them for their loyalty.

While having her pussy rubbed by Alisha, Olivia pees in her shorts in this sexy wetting video. We join Olivia and Alisha making out on the sofa. Needing to pee, Olivia gets up to go to the bathroom, but Alisha stops her. Putting her hand down Olivia’s shorts, she starts rubbing Olivia’s pussy to distract her from going to the bathroom. This is partially successful, as Olivia forgets all bout trying to get to the toilet. But, with her bladder at its limit, Olivia ends up peeing in her shorts, and all over Alisha’s hand.

The user experience focus right now is on providing a high quality streaming media experience. Like most mainstream streaming sites, like Netflix, Disney+, and others, downloading content isn't part of the user experience design. The reason I did this is to save time. Having a clear means to download the videos was creating a support nightmare- Users would try downloading a video, but not know where they saved the video to, how to play it, or be upset that the video wasn't in their preferred format. I faced a constant barrage of emails from users needing help because, essentially, they didn't how to use their computers and would be angry with me because of it. Taking this option out of the user experience design allows me to have more control over the end user's experience, since it is taking place completely on a site I have control over and not on their local machine that I have nothing to do with. Now, with that said, I don't actually do anything on the site to prevent members, who are technically sophisticated enough, from downloading the videos. Just things like download buttons and links are no longer part of the user experience design. The site is backed up in multiple ways. First, a full server backup takes place once a week, where a snapshot of the entire server and its configuration is backed up to another server offsite. In the event of a server failure, a simple DNS change would result in everything being back online, just as it was. On a bi-weekly basis the site, all its content, site files, and database, is backed up to an off site hard drive. If the primary server and off site backup server both went down, a new server would be able to quickly be deployed with the site restored from this backup. This could take a couple days to restore everything. Finally, all the content is backed up. The edited video files and photos from the site are backed up separately from the above referenced methods to multiple hard drives, including drives that are kept at multiple off-site locations, on a regular basis. Additionally, the raw camera files for both photos and videos are maintained separately and backed up individually. They are kept for a period of at least two years. So, even if a site restore from backup is required, and that backup didn't include the most recent updates, there are multiple methods to get those updates back. HD Wetting first went online in 2008, and since then there have been two incidents where we had to restore everything from backups. The first time was due to a server failure. The site was down for just over 24 hours, but was able to be fully restored. The second time was due to police action. Local police, acting on a likely illegal search warrant (its whole own discussion) seized everything they could find involved with HD Wetting. The backup was improperly configured, resulting in the loss of the database that included the content descriptions. However, all the video files were fully restored and no content was lost. I'd also like to note that I am working on a complete rewrite of the site. While this is a long term project, once deployed it is going to introduce an entirely new way of enjoying HD Wetting content for both paying customers and a new free membership tier.

Only Fans also doesn't allow pee content. They will block creators they find who are doing this. I can help! There are a whole bunch of things you can do that will increase your followers, and sales. Feel free to send me a private message if you want to discuss anything in detail, but here is a short rundown of how to build an audience: Do something no one else is doing, and tell people about it This is the biggest thing! You have tons of competitors out there, all making videos and trying to sell them. What makes your content different from what everyone else is doing? Why should I spend my money to buy a video you made instead of from someone else? You need to be able to clearly explain what sets your content unique. Once you know what it is that sets your content apart, you need to use this as the guiding principal in all your content production. You also need to communicate this every chance you get. Otherwise, people have no reason to spend their money with you or care about your content. Even if your content is truly unique, you need to communicate this, otherwise people won't know. Branding You should have a distinct brand- This includes a title or name for your enterprise, graphical style, logo, etc. What word, or words, would someone type into Google to find your content? At a glance, how would someone know they are looking at your Twitter page, or your Clips4sale store? Having consistent branding helps identify content as yours, and helps it stick in people's minds. When your unique content has unique branding people who enjoy what your doing will be able to start to seek you out. Give away free content Most people aren't going to buy your videos unless they have a clear idea of what they are getting. By frequently giving away free content you can build a following and help establish your brand. People who really like what your doing will want more, and some will be willing to pay for it. Increase your posting rate You said you are adding 1 video a week, and posting on twitter two to three times a week. While this is a decent schedule for maintaining your numbers, it won't result in much growth. For Clips4sale, you really need to be adding new content multiple times a week to start to climb the charts and stand out. For building a Twitter following, you are going to want to be posting closer to 2 or 3 times a day, not a week. Your posts should be something that appeals to your audience as well, not just a random post. Share original pictures, video, or other content. Also post more on forums, again, with content that appeals to your audience. Cultivate your audience Don't feel that you need to do everything that every person suggests. There will always be an endless supply of people trying to tell you to produce just what they want. You'll quickly grow exhausted trying to please everyone, without ever getting anywhere. Produce content for the audience you want, and that is the audience that you will develop and grow. Don't try to be everything to everyone. All of this takes a lot of work and time. It isn't an easy way to make money, but if you are serious, and willing to put in the time and effort it can pay off. But it will involve writing posts, and creating content, when you are tired, when you just want to go to bed, when you are feeling rotten. It isn't something you can just step in and out of, as you feel like it, and build a successful business. It is non stop, no matter what.