ronmeyer

Did they leak in any way? Would you risk using them on an unprotected bed?

This question is quite personal. So please only answer if/as far as you are comfortable with it. If I understand what you share here, wetting is a personal kink for you. And you work with quite attractive women who perform exactly that for a job. A job requires a professional relationship though. How do you deal with this? Is this a field of tension for you?

Sadly Lohengrin died several years ago (he was not owner of the site).

Another possibility: Snuppa was around 18-20 when she made the videos. Maybe the typical life changes of this age - education and/or job, moving out of her parents' home, getting into a (new) relationship - made the production no longer feasible. And the guy simply looked for a new model. Sounds kinda creepy.

My all time favorites are Mikki from HDWetting, and Nicki from Wettingherpanties a long time ago. From current productions it is Naomi and Violeta from lovewetting.

Problem with that site is that some time ago they started to sell older videos under new title and publishing date. I got burned buying the same videos twice.

This was indeed the point I was trying to make - along with the suggestion that more model diversity might address this. Of course you are the one who can judge whether you can achieve that given how your business and market works. I did not want to suggest that. You asked for feedback on criticism you received, my feedback was: from my perspective as a customer without any experience in producing content, I agree with the criticism on the price to some degree. If cutting the price is not possible or feasible without compromising the qualities of the site, don't do it. My way to deal with that is that I am not a permanent member but go on and off over time - as I do with competing sites as well. Believe me, I do understand. The site is not slow in general. But the member video index, the member photo index and the index page of larger galleries load slowly for me. They seem to be quite JavaScript-heavy, and mostly they load a lot of data. If I had to try to make these pages faster, I'd try to reduce the amount of data they load, e.g. by using pagination or something. But as I said, it is an aside and it plays no role in my decision if and when an for how long I'm paying a membership. All in all I hope my last post didn't feel discouraging for you, I started to like your site a long time ago and still do, and even if I don't think it is that single extraordinary site out there that it used to be for me couple years ago I will keep coming back to it as long as you can keep it up to the level it still has.

@TVGuy there is some quite detailed and specific feedback in this thread. It would be interesting to read your thoughts on some of these points.

I am currently a member, and I certainly wouldn't be if I thought you should shut the site down. But I do think that improvements could be made, and honestly I do think that there sites out there nowadays that outdo your site in some regards. In my opinion your success varies a bit in that regard. In most videos I do believe that the models are into the wetting. Sometimes it feels that they aren't necessarily that much into the scenario or story line. While this is the less important part, it still plays a role in how authentic a video feels. The models mostly aren't really great actors, and as soon as there is a storyline that requires more acting, the video feels a bit awkward. Videos with natural reactions and interaction of the models work far better for me. In comparison to your acted videos, the challenges and games that Lovewetting uses feel more authentic, and at least some of their models also seem to genuinely have fun with these. I completely agree, but for the reasons stated above it doesn't work out for all of your videos. For me, this would be the reason to give up on your site. I can't quote your original quotes here for some reason, but here's my opinion on that: I do like that your models are different than typical adult models. I find some of them attractive, and some not so much. The thing is, recent content is almost exclusively Sosha, Alisha and recently Lyra. That is not much diversity. Honestly, I don't find Lyra very attractive, and that's of course personal taste. But it means that a good deal of your videos aren't all that appealing for me. Sosha did a couple shoots with a different style, with lots of makeup, no glasses (and even dyed hair?). I don't like these very much either, I love her otherwise very natural style. If possible, working with more different models gives you a much better chance to match the personal taste of more customers. Of course this is absolutely no excuse for the very nasty comments on your models. I find these completely out of line. About the price: with the relatively few models and updates compared to competition, and the limitations of the acted scenarios, your site has a bit of an outdated vibe for me, and your short term membership price is quite high for that. The discounted price of longer-term membership matches my perception of the value of your content for me as a customer much better. But I will take a break after the six month membership spell is over as my budget is limited and I also do like content of other sites. As an aside, the structure and navigation of your site could improve. For example, in the member area, you never see the descriptions of the videos and photoshoots anymore that are on the public part of the site. And the pages for videos and photoshoots load quite slowly.

This looks indeed very cute. Normally I'm more into clothes wetting, but stuff like this tempts to finally get a membership on hd diapers. Any chance you'll ever make a special offer for hdwetting subscribers?