nappypants

I've tried something similar in terms of wetting for 2 seconds, 5 seconds etc. and seeing the extent of the damage. Even a single intentional squirt does a lot more than you would imagine! I saw this on an incontinence product site: 50ml sounds a lot for a "sneeze wee" but the above shows it could be pretty noticeable! And although an incontinent person won't be able to hold large volumes before they wet, someone having an urge incontinence accident as detailed above without a nappy/pull-up on will be visibly soaked down to well below the knees.

How quickly do you go from no urge, to "8 or 9", to wet nappy?

I think women would be better off just not bothering with potty training

Yeah, there was a lot of good stuff on the wetting/diaper topic but also a lot of crap. They destroyed it by banning "adult" content though, a route to oblivion that other sites continue to go down on occasions.

Well, I haven't seen it, but if she was in a coma then she would presumably have been diapered, and if she wakes up and leaves without being seen to by a doctor, then that's presumably what she's still wearing, unless the camera shows some other form of underwear... And if she didn't have feeling in her legs and feet, the same was probably true of her bladder! Still, a hospital nappy would surely leak in a lot less than 13 hours, so your point still stands...

On the similar subject of where adults should have been wearing nappies/diapers in film but weren't, the classic example was Sandra Bullock in Gravity, who really should have had space Pampers on under her spacesuit when she removed it... Also Natalie Portman in the recent movie about the "diaper-wearing astronaut" which omitted the headline feature. As she said in the linked article, "But I guess I still have a diaper movie in my future to fulfill everyone’s expectations"... let's hold her to that promise https://www.indiewire.com/2019/09/lucy-in-the-sky-diaper-natalie-portman-1202177252/

She's probably wearing a nappy (unless there's any camera shots that show you otherwise?)

I prefer a flood through a woman's knickers within sight of the toilet, or where she knows she's not going to be able to get them down without major damage done so just pulls her skirt up, sits on the toilet and wees through her knickers and tights... maybe there's a pad in there because she knows she's a little bit incontinent and has a few little accidents, but it's nowhere near enough to hold back the flood!

I prefer just didn't make it... as she completely soaks her pants within sight of the toilet, or sits down and finishes through her clothes as there's no time to get them down...

As long as you post a warning about nudity I don’t think it will be a problem.

Bedwetting seems the most likely scenario for that to happen, or maybe getting her shirt/top tucked into the back of her nappy!

An otherwise healthy adult can have overactive bladder/urge incontinence... going from no need at all to full flood in your pants within a minute or two, in some cases.

I guess being in an already wet nappy also has that effect, though I'd never really thought about it before!

If they run out then ABU Space might be a good choice for their next batch!

He might have been even more turned on if he had noticed As I said somewhere else, I think a lot of omo “muggles” would find themselves unexpectedly aroused if someone they found attractive had an accident in their pants. Some people actually discover it that way - accidentally, no pun intended...