sitherus 35 Posted January 14, 2019 Share Posted January 14, 2019 Im looking for the real footage from this news story does anyone know where I can find it? https://toronto.citynews.ca/video/2018/09/19/security-guard-fired-after-video-of-woman-urinating-posted-online/ If i know our community I know the video still exists. Kyuu, Imouto Bouquet, The Dark Wolf and 5 others 1 7 Quote Link to comment
BurstingStory 133 Posted January 14, 2019 Share Posted January 14, 2019 Even if it does, it shouldn't be watched. This woman wasn't consented to being filmed, and it was legally and morally wrong for her to be filmed. rachelkirwan and The Dark Wolf 2 Quote Link to comment
The Dark Wolf 1,746 Posted January 14, 2019 ✨ Legendary Member Share Posted January 14, 2019 What @BurstingStory said. If it was filmed without her consent, it's not a video anyone should watch. Stick with ones where they filmed themselves or consented to being filmed and having it posted online, there are many out there. I'm sure the mods will lock this post as soon as they find it. Quote Link to comment
sitherus 35 Posted January 15, 2019 Author Share Posted January 15, 2019 you're telling me you've never watched a "real wetting" not "fake real" but unexpected? Kyuu, desperatewet, largebio and 2 others 1 4 Quote Link to comment
MM68063 195 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 (edited) The women isn't exactly innocent here. She's urinating on the floor of a public building where people walk. She doesn't have to consent to be filmed. She was captured on a public security camera. There is no expectation of privacy. The issue is with guard uploading the footage to Pornhub. I don't know if the guard broke any laws, but it was most definitely a breech of contract with the building. They were right in firing the guard. Edited January 15, 2019 by MM68063 (see edit history) Quote Link to comment
The Dark Wolf 1,746 Posted January 15, 2019 ✨ Legendary Member Share Posted January 15, 2019 So it wasn't filmed in an illegal way, she was the one doing wrong, but that being said this event should not be fetishized, which the guard would have had people do. Quote Link to comment
facade 1,947 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Morality aside. It's likely poor quality and not worth seeking out. Quote Link to comment
DeltaFoxtrot 173 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 4 hours ago, The Dark Wolf said: So it wasn't filmed in an illegal way, she was the one doing wrong, but that being said this event should not be fetishized... If she's pissing on the floor of a public building it's likely she has the fetish. Quote Link to comment
The Dark Wolf 1,746 Posted January 16, 2019 ✨ Legendary Member Share Posted January 16, 2019 7 hours ago, DeltaFoxtrot said: If she's pissing on the floor of a public building it's likely she has the fetish. Well she was abusing it, unless there were no bathrooms in that building and it was an emergency. (For anyone who didn't view the report, she removed her clothing first so it wasn't an accidental wetting) And even if she had the fetish, or it was an accidental wetting, she did not consent to having the incident put on a porn site. That is one of the requirements of porn videos of real people. Quote Link to comment
sitherus 35 Posted January 17, 2019 Author Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) I never post anything unless its art. the first time i post in years I get negative reputation. Im unsure what that means exactly but I would like this topic closed if anyone who has that power can do that I would be grateful. Edited January 17, 2019 by sitherus (see edit history) JMatthews1995 1 Quote Link to comment
TVGuy 10,657 Posted January 17, 2019 🌟 OmoOrg VIP Share Posted January 17, 2019 On 1/14/2019 at 7:04 PM, MM68063 said: The women isn't exactly innocent here. She's urinating on the floor of a public building where people walk. She doesn't have to consent to be filmed. She was captured on a public security camera. There is no expectation of privacy. The issue is with guard uploading the footage to Pornhub. I don't know if the guard broke any laws, but it was most definitely a breech of contract with the building. They were right in firing the guard. Canada has stricter laws regarding one's right to privacy and publication compared to the United States. It very well may have been illegal for the guard to upload, or otherwise publicize the video, without the consent of the person being filmed. If the video was posted to PornHub and viewable in the United States, valid 2257 documentation would be required of the producer. So it is fully possible that some laws were violated here. On 1/15/2019 at 9:18 AM, The Dark Wolf said: So it wasn't filmed in an illegal way, she was the one doing wrong, but that being said this event should not be fetishized, which the guard would have had people do. On 1/15/2019 at 1:59 PM, DeltaFoxtrot said: If she's pissing on the floor of a public building it's likely she has the fetish. There could be all sorts of reasons she peed on the floor. There could be a medical condition, mental health reason, substance abuse, side effect of legal medication. We have no idea what happened here and to jump to the reason being kink related is a bit of a stretch. 21 hours ago, sitherus said: I never post anything unless its art. the first time i post in years I get negative reputation. Im unsure what that means exactly but I would like this topic closed if anyone who has that power can do that I would be grateful. Don't worry, your reputation isn't that low. It should be possible to get back to a positive rep with just a few posts. As far as what it means exactly... It just means that the community values everyone involved consenting. You asked for content that involved the lack of consent of one of the participants, and the community reacted to that. JMatthews1995 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.