Jump to content
Existing user? Sign In

Sign In



Sign Up

When is it ok for Omo fetishists to deny the bathroom


Recommended Posts

On 6/6/2018 at 9:20 AM, HoldingPrinces said:

In my school, girls are allowed to go to the washrooms only during the lunch break. (Or otherwise should have got special permission through a Medical certificate) Then all the girls run to the washroom at the lunch break, making a huge rush and a queue, where most of us will have to stand in the queue during whole interval or give up the idea of peeing. So most have to give up the idea of peeing and continue the pee hold with already full bladder. I'm ok with this because I'm an omorashi girl. But I feel very sorry for other girls who are not into omorashi.

And also they close and lock the toilets in school during public holidays. If I go to school for special dancing practices, I have to hold all day. In the first day when I asked about the key, a janitor denied my need saying that he cannot override the constitution and regulations 

Look. This is off topic, I know.

I understand you're ok with holding from morning to sundown, but just... why would a school lock the bathrooms for all the girls except during lunch break??? I'm sorry that's just honestly one of the most baffling regulations I have ever heard of, to the point where I'm tempted to say it's pretty blatantly sexist.

Girl's bathrooms already get stopped up more quickly than boy's bathrooms do, because they have to be all stalls and you can't fit nearly as many stalls in as you can urinals, and don't AFAB people have, on average, smaller bladders than AMAB people? The last part doesn't really matter as much as it isn't true, but if any of this is set up the way I'm guessing it is from the word choice, your school's faculty must be full of creeps, male supremacists, or most likely both.

And that's not getting into what happens if you get sick????? Do people just end up making messes all over the floor? I know from personal experience that if someone gets diarrhea or ends up feeling like they need to vomit, they could have mere minutes to find a restroom, a far cry from the amount of time the average person can hold their pee in an extreme situation. I'm sorry, I know I'm off topic and I just ranted about something you don't really have control over, but honestly if I went to that school I would make a massive fuss about it.

Just... no one should be deprived access to a bathroom for more than a few minutes. Whether or not it's for your own sexual pleasure, it's just cruel.

EDIT: Actually I looked through HoldingPrincess's profile, and they've said boys have to wait until lunch break too, but that honestly doesn't make it any better??

Edited by Clownpiece (see edit history)
Link to comment

It really depends on the details.

Making an unwilling wife wet herself might not be the moral right (without quite a lot of rationalization), but if you know it's not going to bother her all that much at the end of the day, it may not be 'right,' but I don't really see any reason to degrade morals by invoking them here. You should probably consider this more in your personal social sphere, as in how it affects things in your own life, rather than deliberating on whether or not you did evil. When we extend this out to random people, things get more complicated.

Will you potentially be fired if you let the desperate pregnant woman use the employee bathroom? Maybe it's a worthy risk, but what if you have a family you have to feed and debt already accumulated? Her pants will dry and she'll get over the embarrassment, but at the end of the day, is it right to put your family's well being at risk to prevent someone from having an accident? Likely no. In this case, most of the moral responsibility would fall back on the uncaring boss.

What if you won't get fired? Maybe you'll just get in trouble for it. In that case, it's likely the more moral move to let them go, but this comes with some complications. One is whether or not they seem desperate. Two is the very fact you have to presume that first thing, without knowing anything about their physiology, their mannerisms, or the fact they may not find another bathroom. In the case of pregnancy, you know there might be an issue, but what about a shy girl who hides her need? A little more difficult to say. The desperation gauging issue is likely a large issue among teachers. Three is a question of are you compelled to do it just because it is right? Aren't you allowed to let a person be desperate sometimes? To sometimes do the wrong thing? But this exceeds the breadth of the convo.

Each case comes with it's own set of complications. One big question that I think comes after this one is even if someone makes the immoral choice, what will you do about it? Does anything need to be done? And again, it depends on the individual case. I don't think there is much of a golden standard here, beyond the simple concept that in most cases, causing another displeasure for the propagation of your own pleasure is likely not the moral thing to do, but these are personal junctions, ones that can't often be properly evaluated from the outside.

Link to comment

I used to work in a grocery store that was part of a small shopping center. Usually we'd deny people access to the employee bathroom and tell them to use the public bathroom in the center, but if they said there was a line or it's out of order, I'd let them in and escort them through our office to the bathroom, then escort them back out.

In the case of a parent asking for their kid to use the bathroom, I'd always let them in. My boss sometimes complained, but I never got into any real trouble.

I don't mind finding some fetish-related pleasure from strangers in need, as long as I'm not responsible for it. If I'm holding the key to the bathroom, I'd never deny someone access just for the hell of it.

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
On 6/4/2018 at 11:35 AM, DimitriT said:

I think it's more of a cultural difference rather than company policy. When I was traveling around Europe it was very common in many countries, you have to either buy something there either pay a small fee to access the restrooms (usually it was 1 euro). As an example I remember one big 2 stories McDonalds (can't remember if it was France or Spain) where uniformed janitor was standing with the mop in front of the restrooms and you had to give him 1 euro to be allowed to enter unless you show him receipt that you ordered food at the counter. I had to pay at many gas stations, restaurants and small stores in Europe to visit a restroom when I didn't have an intent to buy anything, free restroom was something rare to find. The same in my homecountry, many places charge you money for the restroom or simply deny access unless you're a paying customer, they don't want random people from the street go and use their restrooms because it causes more cleanups and doesn't make them profits. When I came to the US several years ago I was kinda surprised that I could just go almost anywhere and use the restrooms freely.

i think it would result in even more cleanup if you dont let people use the toilet without paying, it doesnt cost any extra to let someone go in for a pee, but it costs a lot of time and money if you have people wetting themselves in your store due to some weird policy

here in Australia you just go to the counter and ask them to unlock it for you, no purchase necessary (i have never seen a toilet locked behind a paywall)

Link to comment
5 hours ago, LucyDL said:

i think it would result in even more cleanup if you dont let people use the toilet without paying, it doesnt cost any extra to let someone go in for a pee, but it costs a lot of time and money if you have people wetting themselves in your store due to some weird policy

To be honest, I haven't seen anyone willing to wet themselves in public just to save 1 Euro. In the worst scenario, if someone didn't have any money on them, people just go pee in bushes or something like that.

Link to comment
6 hours ago, DimitriT said:

To be honest, I haven't seen anyone willing to wet themselves in public just to save 1 Euro. In the worst scenario, if someone didn't have any money on them, people just go pee in bushes or something like that.

i dont necessarily mean they do it intentionally, maybe a few just really had to go and had an accident while trying to get whoever to open the door

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...