Fisk 106 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 I would make an official bet that the person behind this art project shares our interest. Ecchi Roulette, pontiac450 and panther 3 Quote Link to comment
garador 51 Posted July 19, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted July 19, 2017 1 hour ago, thomascromwell2 said: Feminists... and using the money people pay for the State as taxes to do this kind of "art". Brazil needs help. Communism and Socialism have destroied our country. Honestly, I expect that the portion of your country's budget that goes to "art" is a rounding error. I'm not going to presume to tell you what your country's problems are, but I will presume to tell you that a few centavos going to silly artists is not one of them - and any politician that tells you otherwise is doing so to distract you from the real problems those politicians are causing. nwohdeh, ShyGuy, TheGreatNobody and 10 others 13 Quote Link to comment
Xeno_ 160 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 2 hours ago, thomascromwell2 said: Feminists... and using the money people pay for the State as taxes to do this kind of "art". Brazil needs help. Communism and Socialism have destroied our country. This isn't about feminists, communists or socialists destroying Brazil. The people primarily responsible for the country's sorry sorry state of affairs are Lula, Dilma, Michel Temer, their cronies, and Petrobras and the various other companies involved in this mess. As @garador points out, the amount of money given to produce this performance, whether or not it counts as art, is miniscule compared to the amounts of money being moved in the corruption scandals. TheGreatNobody and Mattshark 2 Quote Link to comment
LOLC2k 211 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 I do question how this is art. I mean, granted, wetting doesn't interest me anyhow, but I don't see how this art. Or feminism. Looks to me like a fetish scenario. Nothing wrong with that, but I don't see how it's something "higher calling" than that. As for the waste of taxpayers money, it can be both a waste and a drop in the bucket, so to speak. I agree calling it a problem dooming a nation is ridiculous because the cost is so low.... that doesn't make it not a waste. Quote Link to comment
phile474917 28 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 I find it a bit hilarious that even here threads derail into politics. Oberdorfer, Fisk, Bismiris and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment
Guest watermyflowers Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 1 hour ago, phile474917 said: I find it a bit hilarious that even here threads derail into politics. There separate group wettings (one in an auditorium, one at night outside, one in daylight outside) and the bulk of commentary is about politics? I'm not against political commentary. I just wish there was more wetting commentary. These group public art wettings are rare. Quote Link to comment
Explorermonkey 504 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Downloaded the preview of the outdoor one if anyone wants it. It would be super if anyone had the full version! :) videoplayback.mp4 Mattshark 1 Quote Link to comment
Mattshark 61 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 4 hours ago, thomascromwell2 said: Yes. But feminism and using taxes for this kind of thing is a big problem. Do you even know what feminism is? Do you know socialism and communism and democratic socialism are not the same things? MOV, Ecchi Roulette, chriswalker83 and 3 others 5 1 Quote Link to comment
monkeyboy 37 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 45 minutes ago, Mattshark said: Do you even know what feminism is? Do you know socialism and communism and democratic socialism are not the same things? Do you know that nobody cares this is a fetish site not a place to spill your political views by using big words to seem intelligent and put people down I believe there is a thread for this,sort of thing Theonlysaneperson, pontiac450, ShyGuy and 2 others 3 2 Quote Link to comment
yertle2012 294 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Totally art. This particular work probably has a different effect on most other people. There's always been eroticism in art. I didn't think I'd like it, but in the words of Steve Martin, it made me feel "emotionally... erect." Quote Link to comment
pm979mp 181 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 So like...how is wetting your pants in public an expression of feminism? I don't get it Riptide101 and facade 2 Quote Link to comment
pontiac450 49 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 4 hours ago, monkeyboy said: Do you know that nobody cares this is a fetish site not a place to spill your political views by using big words to seem intelligent and put people down I believe there is a thread for this,sort of thing But then how else will people know that my opinions are better than their opinions? Theonlysaneperson, facade and monkeyboy 3 Quote Link to comment
Earth Shock 59 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 This is kind of "wtf is this... I like it." for me. Quote Link to comment
Mattshark 61 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 8 hours ago, monkeyboy said: Do you know that nobody cares this is a fetish site not a place to spill your political views by using big words to seem intelligent and put people down I believe there is a thread for this,sort of thing Ah, so the post attacking feminism is ok, but someone daring to question that isn't. Right. TheGreatNobody, kochel428, facade and 1 other 3 1 Quote Link to comment
monkeyboy 37 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 39 minutes ago, Mattshark said: Ah, so the post attacking feminism is ok, but someone daring to question that isn't. Right. I never said anyone was right I simply quoted the last post There are threads for this sort of discussion Anti-SJW {211} and facade 2 Quote Link to comment
kadabra 65 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) Dona Smek´s Instagram (first two pics) instagram. com / dora.smek / Patricia Pina Cruz (instagram video posted in this post -she is one of the performers-) instagram .com / patriciapinacruz / Gabi Andrade´s Instagram (second two pics) (she is also another performer) instagram .com / gabimap / Edit: Leticia Kamada (fifth pic) instagram .com / leticiakamada / Edited July 20, 2017 by kadabra (see edit history) Xeno_, Sentinelchicken, Vulpis and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment
Anh Quynh 37 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 I would be taker for all the videos available. Quote Link to comment
slovenc79 158 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) damn , i too would love to see the whole thing. the closeups, the faces, the sounds... its really is a kind of art. i really hate the political bullshit gets involved into it. Edited July 20, 2017 by slovenc79 (see edit history) Quote Link to comment
Cookie V.3 10 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 It's just pictures of a line of woman pissing themselves with a filter, it shouldn't count as art. I see no deeper meaning. thomascromwell 1 Quote Link to comment
realmadrid 412 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Honestly, I've never seen something so awesome. Not my type of art, but really who am I to complain? This is straight out of omo fantasy land. I think we should be happy this "art" exists! Theonlysaneperson and szledziwski 2 Quote Link to comment
Cookie V.3 10 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 2 hours ago, realmadrid said: Honestly, I've never seen something so awesome. Not my type of art, but really who am I to complain? This is straight out of omo fantasy land. I think we should be happy this "art" exists! It's not even erotic for me. No desperation, just a bunch of random women pissing themselves in a line on command, that's only half the appeal of Omorashi. You can like it, but calling it art is blatantly wrong, that's just my point. Quote Link to comment
omodaddy 477 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 You can't say what isn't art. If someone finds it creative & unique then in there book an ART. I definitely consider this an art. In "my", it's the ART of wetting It's unique, I found pleasure in female wetting and they find pleasure wetting themselves. Therefore, it IS indeed an art. Definition of art: the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance. Celestia and OmoJack 2 Quote Link to comment
Cookie V.3 10 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, aklong said: You can't say what isn't art. If someone finds it creative & unique then in there book an ART. I definitely consider this an art. In "my", it's the ART of wetting It's unique, I found pleasure in female wetting and they find pleasure wetting themselves. Therefore, it IS indeed an art. Definition of art: the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance. You're confusing art with amusing spectacle. That's like saying a Porno with no story is art because it makes you feel erect, it's made solely to pleasure yourself, no emotion, no meaning(And that's probably why she made this in the first place). By that logic, a pillow is art because it makes you feel tired when you lay on it. If you didn't have a pee fetish, this art would make you feel nothing or disgusted, not the intended emotion. What you feel is subjective. The "art" for me doesn't make me feel anything, just my thoughts on the matter. Telling me that I can't tell people what art Is and then immediately going on to tell me what your definition of art is is very hypocritical. There is no absolute definition, it's all in the eye of the beholder. I probably should've put "IMO" behind it, to be fair. https://qz.com/703590/can-anything-be-art-an-art-historian-explains-why-not/ Edited July 21, 2017 by Cookie V.3 (see edit history) Quote Link to comment
omodaddy 477 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 32 minutes ago, Cookie V.3 said: You're confusing art with amusing spectacle. That's like saying a Porno with no story is art because it makes you feel erect, it's made solely to pleasure yourself, no emotion, no meaning(And that's probably why she made this in the first place). By that logic, a pillow is art because it makes you feel tired when you lay on it. If you didn't have a pee fetish, this art would make you feel nothing or disgusted, not the intended emotion. What you feel is subjective. The "art" for me doesn't make me feel anything, just my thoughts on the matter. Telling me that I can't tell people what art Is and then immediately going on to tell me what your definition of art is is very hypocritical. There is no absolute definition, it's all in the eye of the beholder. I probably should've put "IMO" behind it, to be fair. https://qz.com/703590/can-anything-be-art-an-art-historian-explains-why-not/ Invalid point. Art is UNIQUE, everyone like different forms of art. It's not just one thing. A woman's body makes me erect, do I see them as art? YES! A women's body definitely art! Some may not see it that way. You can't tell someone that something isn't art and it's considered an art in there eyes. If someone draws a painting of a women wetting her pants, that's drawing is not considered an art?? I would like that drawing because women wetting is very unique and a lovely site. We all have our opions tho. Celestia 1 Quote Link to comment
Cookie V.3 10 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) 43 minutes ago, aklong said: Invalid point. Art is UNIQUE, everyone like different forms of art. It's not just one thing. A woman's body makes me erect, do I see them as art? YES! A women's body definitely art! Some may not see it that way. You can't tell someone that something isn't art and it's considered an art in there eyes. If someone draws a painting of a women wetting her pants, that's drawing is not considered an art?? I would like that drawing because women wetting is very unique and a lovely site. We all have our opions tho. I never said that there isn't multiple art forms, nor did I say that people can't enjoy it. In my opinion, art must have a meaning or intended emotion that it fulfills to be considered as such. That's why I don't believe that mindless porn scenes with no context is considered art. Same can be said for these pictures. There is such thing as "meaningless art" but once more, definition is subjective and I don't consider them as art. I'm not telling you an objective meaning for art, I'm telling my own subjective viewpoint, because the definition of art is not absolute, they just had to pick one at the end of the day. Edited July 21, 2017 by Cookie V.3 (see edit history) Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.