Jump to content
Existing user? Sign In

Sign In



Sign Up

female A lot of women wet her pants in public for "art"


Guest holaa

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Honestly, I expect that the portion of your country's budget that goes to "art" is a rounding error. I'm not going to presume to tell you what your country's problems are, but I will presume to tell y

A Pleasure! Mijar nas calças é arte- E se for pago com dinheiro publico-.mp4

Posted Images

2 hours ago, thomascromwell2 said:

Feminists... and using the money people pay for the State as taxes to do this kind of "art". Brazil needs help. Communism and Socialism have destroied our country.

This isn't about feminists, communists or socialists destroying Brazil. The people primarily responsible for the country's sorry sorry state of affairs are Lula, Dilma, Michel Temer, their cronies, and Petrobras and the various other companies involved in this mess. As @garador points out, the amount of money given to produce this performance, whether or not it counts as art, is miniscule compared to the amounts of money being moved in the corruption scandals.

Link to comment

I do question how this is art. I mean, granted, wetting doesn't interest me anyhow, but I don't see how this art. Or feminism. Looks to me like a fetish scenario. Nothing wrong with that, but I don't see how it's something "higher calling" than that.

 

As for the waste of taxpayers money, it can be both a waste and a drop in the bucket, so to speak. I agree calling it a problem dooming a nation is ridiculous because the cost is so low.... that doesn't make it not a waste.

Link to comment
Guest watermyflowers
1 hour ago, phile474917 said:

I find it a bit hilarious that even here threads derail into politics. 

There separate group wettings (one in an auditorium, one at night outside, one in daylight outside) and the bulk of commentary is about politics?    I'm not against political commentary.  I just wish there was more wetting commentary.  These group public art wettings are rare. 

Link to comment
45 minutes ago, Mattshark said:

Do you even know what feminism is?

Do you know socialism and communism and democratic socialism are not the same things?

Do you know that nobody cares this is a fetish site not a place to spill your political views by using big words to seem intelligent and put people down I believe there is a thread for this,sort of thing

Link to comment

Dona Smek´s Instagram (first two pics)

instagram. com / dora.smek /

 

Patricia Pina Cruz (instagram video posted in this post -she is one of the performers-)

instagram .com / patriciapinacruz /

 

Gabi Andrade´s Instagram (second two pics) (she is also another performer)

instagram .com / gabimap /

 

Edit:

Leticia Kamada (fifth pic)

instagram .com / leticiakamada /

 

 

19932621_1893901704192001_7645843180532793344_n.jpg

19955371_1626671907405549_9213421237580070912_n.jpg

19955559_297469333992073_4674703513761087488_n.jpg

20181006_108542119803562_950440927908855808_n.jpg

19985441_131876007400843_4925088381857169408_n.jpg

Edited by kadabra (see edit history)
Link to comment
2 hours ago, realmadrid said:

Honestly, I've never seen something so awesome. Not my type of art, but really who am I to complain? This is straight out of omo fantasy land. I think we should be happy this "art" exists!

It's not even erotic for me. No desperation, just a bunch of random women pissing themselves in a line on command, that's only half the appeal of Omorashi. You can like it, but calling it art is blatantly wrong, that's just my point.

Link to comment

You can't say what isn't art.  If someone finds it creative & unique then in there book an ART.  I definitely consider this an art.  In "my", it's the ART of wetting   It's unique, I found pleasure in female wetting and they find pleasure wetting themselves.  Therefore, it IS indeed an art.

Definition of art:

  1. the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, aklong said:

You can't say what isn't art.  If someone finds it creative & unique then in there book an ART.  I definitely consider this an art.  In "my", it's the ART of wetting   It's unique, I found pleasure in female wetting and they find pleasure wetting themselves.  Therefore, it IS indeed an art.

Definition of art:

  1. the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

You're confusing art with amusing spectacle. That's like saying  a Porno with no story is art because it makes you feel erect, it's made solely to pleasure yourself, no emotion, no meaning(And that's probably why she made this in the first place). By that logic, a pillow is art because it makes you feel tired when you lay on it. If you didn't have a pee fetish, this art would make you feel nothing or disgusted, not the intended emotion. What you feel is subjective. The "art" for me doesn't make me feel anything, just my thoughts on the matter.

Telling me that I can't tell people what art Is and then immediately going on to tell me what your definition of art is is very hypocritical. There is no absolute definition, it's all in the eye of the beholder. I probably should've put "IMO" behind it, to be fair.

https://qz.com/703590/can-anything-be-art-an-art-historian-explains-why-not/

Edited by Cookie V.3 (see edit history)
Link to comment
32 minutes ago, Cookie V.3 said:

You're confusing art with amusing spectacle. That's like saying  a Porno with no story is art because it makes you feel erect, it's made solely to pleasure yourself, no emotion, no meaning(And that's probably why she made this in the first place). By that logic, a pillow is art because it makes you feel tired when you lay on it. If you didn't have a pee fetish, this art would make you feel nothing or disgusted, not the intended emotion. What you feel is subjective. The "art" for me doesn't make me feel anything, just my thoughts on the matter.

Telling me that I can't tell people what art Is and then immediately going on to tell me what your definition of art is is very hypocritical. There is no absolute definition, it's all in the eye of the beholder. I probably should've put "IMO" behind it, to be fair.

https://qz.com/703590/can-anything-be-art-an-art-historian-explains-why-not/

Invalid point.  Art is UNIQUE, everyone like different forms of art.  It's not just one thing.  A woman's body makes me erect, do I see them as art?  YES!  A women's body definitely art!  Some may not see it that way.  You can't tell someone that something isn't art and it's considered an art in there eyes.  If someone draws a painting of a women wetting her pants, that's drawing is not considered an art??  I would like that drawing because women wetting is very unique and a lovely site.  We all have our opions tho. 

Link to comment
43 minutes ago, aklong said:

Invalid point.  Art is UNIQUE, everyone like different forms of art.  It's not just one thing.  A woman's body makes me erect, do I see them as art?  YES!  A women's body definitely art!  Some may not see it that way.  You can't tell someone that something isn't art and it's considered an art in there eyes.  If someone draws a painting of a women wetting her pants, that's drawing is not considered an art??  I would like that drawing because women wetting is very unique and a lovely site.  We all have our opions tho. 

I never said that there isn't multiple art forms, nor did I say that people can't enjoy it. In my opinion, art must have a meaning or intended emotion that it fulfills to be considered as such. That's why I don't believe that mindless porn scenes with no context is considered art. Same can be said for these pictures. There is such thing as "meaningless art" but once more, definition is subjective and I don't consider them as art.

I'm not telling you an objective meaning for art, I'm telling my own subjective viewpoint, because the definition of art is not absolute, they just had to pick one at the end of the day.

Edited by Cookie V.3 (see edit history)
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...